ASA TR S12.13 2002 R2016
$68.25
ANSI/ASA S12.3-1985 (R2016) American National Standard Statistical Methods for Determining and Verifying Stated Noise Emission Values of Machinery and Equipment
Published By | Publication Date | Number of Pages |
ASA | 2002 | 33 |
None
PDF Catalog
PDF Pages | PDF Title |
---|---|
13 | 0 Introduction 0.1 Need 0.2 Rationale 0.3 Alternative Approaches |
14 | 0.4 Brief Historical Review 0.5 Report Development Process 0.6 Benefits of ADBA 0.6.1 Enhancing Prevention of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss |
15 | 0.6.2 Providing Cost-Effective Data for Regulatory Compliance 0.6.3 Guiding Internal Management Decisions |
16 | 0.6.4 Motivating Workers and Supervisors 1 Scope, purpose and applications 1.1 Scope 1.2 Purpose 1.3 Applications 1.3.1 Assumptions 1.3.1.1 Effective Hearing Conservation Program 1.3.1.2 Audiometric Variability as an Indicator |
17 | 1.3.1.3 Analysis of a Restricted Data Base 1.3.1.4 Reliance on ADBA Results 1.3.1.5 Interpretation of Undesirable Results 1.3.2 Data Requirements 1.3.2.1 Annual Audiometry 1.3.2.2 Constant Restricted Population 1.3.2.3 Minimum Number of Audiograms 1.3.2.4 Representative Restricted Population 1.3.2.5 Minimum Size of Restricted Population 1.3.2.6 Identification of Obvious Contaminants in the Data |
18 | 1.3.2.7 Audiometric Testing During Workshifts 2 References |
19 | 3 Definitions 4 Recommended ADBA Statistics 4.1 Procedures 4.2 Criterion Ranges 5 Implementing the Procedures 5.1 Selecting the Restricted Data Base |
20 | 5.1.1 Early Tests 5.1.2 Later Tests 5.2 Examining the Data for Contamination 5.3 Applying the ADBA Procedures 5.3.1 Percent Worse Sequential (%Ws 5.3.2 Percent Better or Worse Sequential (%BWs |
21 | 6 Interpreting the Results 6.1 Classifying HCP Effectiveness 6.2 Identifying Sources of High Variability A Population Comparison ADBA Techniques A.1 Comparisons at One Point in Time |
22 | A.2 Comparisons of Longitudinal Hearing Level Trends A.3 References B Rates of OSHA STS as an Indicator B.1 Common Use of STS Rates B.2 Reasons for Excluding STS Rates from this Report B.3 References |
23 | C Research Performed by S12/WG12 C.1 Data Tape Availability C.2 Procedures Evaluated |
24 | C.3 Recommended Procedures C.4 Data Base Comparisons Used to Define Criterion Ranges |
25 | C.5 Defining the Criterion Ranges C.6 Conclusions and Recommendations C.7 References |
29 | D Analysis Example |