Shopping Cart

No products in the cart.

BSI PD CEN/TS 17286:2019

$198.66

Stationary source emissions. Mercury monitoring using sorbent traps

Published By Publication Date Number of Pages
BSI 2019 66
Guaranteed Safe Checkout
Categories: ,

If you have any questions, feel free to reach out to our online customer service team by clicking on the bottom right corner. We’re here to assist you 24/7.
Email:[email protected]

The purpose of this document is to establish performance benchmarks for, and to evaluate the acceptability of, sorbent trap monitoring systems used to monitor total vapour- phase mercury (Hg) emissions in stationary source flue gas streams. These monitoring systems involve continuous repetitive in-flue sampling using paired sorbent traps with subsequent analysis of the time-integrated samples.

This document is suitable for both short-term (periodic) measurements and long-term (continuous) monitoring using sorbent traps.

NOTE When this Technical Specification has been validated, the sorbent trap method will be an Alternative Method subject to the restrictions on applicability defined below. Until that time, EN 13211 is the only accepted Reference Method for both short-term (periodic) measurements and for calibrating continuous monitoring systems, including those with long-term sampling systems. EN 13211 is a wet chemistry approach that relies on absorption of mercury into impinger solutions.

The substance measured according to this specification is the total vapour phase mercury in the flue gas, which represents the sum of the elemental mercury (Hg0) and gaseous forms of oxidized mercury (Hg2+), such as mercury (II) chloride, in mass concentration units of micrograms (μg) per dry meter cubed (m3). The analytical range is typically 0,1 to greater than 50 μg/m3.

The sorbent tube approach is intended for use under relatively low particulate conditions (typically less than 100 mg/m3) when monitoring downstream of all pollution control devices, e.g. at coal fired power plants and cement plants. In this case, the contribution of mercury in the particulate fraction is considered to be negligible (typically less than 5 % of total mercury). However, it shall be noted that the sorbent trap does take account of the finest particle fraction that is sampled with the flue gas, in addition to capturing the vapour phase mercury.

This specification also contains routine procedures and specifications that are designed to evaluate the ongoing performance of an installed sorbent trap monitoring system. The operator of the industrial installation is responsible for the correct calibration, maintenance and operation of this long-term sampling system. Additional requirements for calibration and quality assurance of the long-term sampling system are then defined in EN 14884 and EN 14181.

PDF Catalog

PDF Pages PDF Title
2 undefined
9 1 Scope
2 Normative references
10 3 Terms and definitions
11 4 Symbols and abbreviations
13 5 Principle
6 Measuring equipment
17 7 Reagents and standards
8 Performance specification test procedure
20 9 Quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC)
23 10 Calibration and standardization
24 11 Analytical performance criteria
28 12 Calculations, data reduction, data analysis and reporting
33 Annex A (informative)Gaseous Hg0 sorbent trap spiking system
37 Annex B (informative)Calculation of flue gas moisture content
B.1 Plants with wet abatement systems
B.2 Plants without wet abatement systems
B.2.1 General
B.2.2 Calculating moisture content from a stoichiometric fuel factor
38 B.2.3 Calculating moisture content from flue gas properties
40 Annex C (normative)Performance criteria and test procedures for certification of long-term sampling systems
C.1 General requirements
41 C.2 Validation of the installation/functioning on each plant
C.2.1 Preparation
C.2.1.1 General
C.2.1.2 Minimum requirements for set-up
C.2.1.3 Minimum requirements for selecting the sampling point
C.3 Performance criteria and test procedure for certification
C.3.1 General relation to other standards
C.3.2 General requirements
C.3.2.1 Application of the minimum requirements
C.3.2.2 Certification ranges
42 C.3.3 Performance criteria common to all long-term sampling systems for laboratory testing
C.3.3.1 Performance criteria for the automatic volume proportional flow control
C.3.3.2 Requirements of EN 152673
C.3.4 Performance criteria common to all long-term sampling systems for field testing
C.3.4.1 For the automatic volume proportional flow control
C.3.4.2 Status information
C.3.4.3 Availability
43 C.3.4.4 Reproducibility
44 C.3.4.5 Automatic post-adjustment unit
C.3.4.6 Breakthrough criteria of used traps
C.3.4.7 Paired trap agreement
C.3.4.8 Number of values to be determined
C.3.4.9 Labelling
C.3.4.10 Relation to the plant conditions
C.3.4.11 Volume proportional control
C.3.4.12 Essential characteristic data
45 Annex D (informative)Sorbent traps configurations
D.1 Sorbent trap dimensions
D.2 Sorbent trap configurations
47 Annex E (normative)Reporting of sampling information
E.1 Reporting
E.1.1 Short-term sampling
E.1.1.1 General
E.1.1.2 Basic information
E.1.1.3 Sampling data for each trap
48 E.1.2 Long-term sampling
E.1.3 Interruption of data recording
49 E.1.4 Reporting the validation of a long-term sampling system (from the manufacturer and the test laboratory)
50 Annex F (informative)Example uncertainty budget for mercury measurement using sorbent traps
F.1 Introduction
F.2 Elements required for the uncertainty determinations
F.2.1 Model equation
F.3 Example of an uncertainty calculation
F.3.1 Specific conditions in the field
52 F.3.2 Performance characteristics
53 F.4 Model equation and application of rule of uncertainty propagation
F.4.1 Concentration of Hg
F.4.1.1 General
54 F.4.1.2 Calculation of the combined uncertainty of Vm and Cm
F.4.1.3 Based on Formula (F.1) the combined uncertainty of Cm can be expressed by Formula (F.6):
55 F.4.1.4 Calculation of sensitivity coefficients
F.4.1.5 Results of the standard uncertainties calculations
57 F.4.1.6 Estimation of the combined uncertainty
60 Annex G (informative)Calculation of the uncertainty associated with correcting to dry gas conditions at an oxygen reference concentration
G.1 Uncertainty associated with a concentration expressed on dry gas
62 G.2 Uncertainty associated with a concentration expressed at an oxygen reference concentration
BSI PD CEN/TS 17286:2019
$198.66