AAMI 5840 1 2022
$177.85
ANSI/AAMI/ISO 5840-1:2022, Cardiovascular implants—Cardiac valve prostheses—Part 1: General requirements
Published By | Publication Date | Number of Pages |
AAMI | 2022 |
Outlines an approach for verifying/validating the design and manufacture of a heart valve substitute through risk management. The selection of appropriate qualification tests and methods are derived from the risk assessment. The tests can include those to assess the physical, chemical, biological, and mechanical properties of heart valve substitutes and of their materials and components. The tests can also include those for preclinical in vivo evaluation and clinical evaluation of the finished heart valve substitute.
PDF Catalog
PDF Pages | PDF Title |
---|---|
1 | ANSI/AAMI/ISO 5840-1:2022; Cardiovascular implants—Cardiac valve prostheses—Part 1: General requirements |
3 | Title page |
4 | AAMI Standard Copyright information |
5 | Contents Page |
9 | Background of ANSI/AAMI adoption of ISO 5840-1:2021 |
10 | Foreword |
11 | Introduction |
13 | 1 Scope 2 Normative references |
14 | 3 Terms and definitions |
26 | 4 Abbreviations |
27 | 5 Fundamental requirements 6 Device description 6.1 General 6.2 Intended use 6.3 Design inputs 6.3.1 Operational specifications |
28 | Table 1—Heart valve substitute operational environment for left side of heart — Adult population |
29 | Table 2—Heart valve substitute operational environment for right side of heart — Adult population 6.3.2 Performance specifications 6.3.3 Implant procedure |
30 | 6.3.4 Packaging, labelling, and sterilization 6.4 Design outputs 6.5 Design transfer (manufacturing verification/validation) 6.6 Risk management 7 Design verification and validation 7.1 General requirements |
31 | 7.2 In vitro assessment 7.2.1 General 7.2.2 Test conditions, sample selection and reporting requirements 7.2.2.1 Test articles and sample selection 7.2.2.2 Test conditions Table 3—Recommended pressure values for in vitro testing for left side of heart — Adult population |
32 | Table 4—Recommended pressure values for in vitro testing for right side of heart — Adult population 7.2.2.3 Reporting requirements 7.2.3 Material property assessment 7.2.3.1 General 7.2.3.2 Biological safety |
33 | 7.2.3.3 Material and mechanical property testing 7.2.4 Hydrodynamic performance assessment 7.2.5 Structural performance assessment 7.2.5.1 General 7.2.5.2 Implant durability assessment |
34 | 7.2.5.3 Device structural component fatigue assessment 7.2.5.4 Component corrosion assessment |
35 | 7.2.6 Design- or procedure-specific testing 7.2.7 Device MRI compatibility 7.2.8 Simulated use 7.2.9 Human factors/usability assessment 7.2.10 Implant thrombogenic and haemolytic potential assessment |
36 | 7.3 Preclinical in vivo evaluation 7.4 Clinical investigations |
37 | Annex A (informative) Rationale for the provisions of ISO 5840-1 A.1 Rationale for a risk-based approach A.2 Rationale for preclinical in vivo evaluation A.3 Rationale for design verification and design validation testing |
38 | A.4 Rationale for echocardiographic assessment A.5 Rationale for clinical evaluation reporting A.6 Rationale for device sizing within labelling and instructions for use |
39 | A.7 Rationale for human factors engineering |
40 | Annex B (normative) Packaging B.1 Requirements B.2 Principle B.3 Containers B.3.1 Unit container(s) B.3.2 Outer container |
41 | Annex C (normative) Product labels, instructions for use, and training C.1 General C.1.1 General requirements C.1.2 Unit-container label C.1.3 Outer-container label |
42 | C.1.4 Instructions for use |
43 | C.1.5 Labels for medical records C.2 Training for physicians and support staff |
44 | Annex D (normative) Sterilization |
45 | Annex E (normative) In vitro test guidelines for paediatric devices E.1 General and paediatric definitions Table E.1—Paediatric definitions |
46 | E.2 Pulsatile flow test conditions — Left side Table E.2—Pulsatile flow test conditions — Left side E.3 Pulsatile flow test conditions — Right side Table E.3—Pulsatile flow test conditions — Right side |
47 | E.4 Steady back pressure and forward flow conditions — Left side Table E.4—Steady back pressure and forward flow conditions — Left side E.5 Steady back pressure and forward flow conditions — Right side Table E.5—Steady back pressure and forward flow conditions — Right side |
48 | E.6 Accelerated wear testing (AWT) test conditions — Left side Table E.6—AWT test conditions — Left side E.7 Accelerated wear testing (AWT) test conditions — Right side Table E.7—AWT test conditions — Right side |
49 | E.8 FEA/life analysis conditions — Left side Table E.8—FEA/life analysis conditions — Left side E.9 FEA/life analysis conditions — Right side Table E.9—FEA/life analysis conditions — Right side |
50 | Annex F (informative) Corrosion assessment F.1 Rationale F.2 General F.3 Pitting corrosion |
51 | F.4 Crevice corrosion F.5 Galvanic corrosion F.6 Corrosion fatigue |
52 | F.7 Fretting (wear) and fretting corrosion F.8 Post-fatigue corrosion evaluation |
53 | Annex G (informative) Echocardiographic protocol G.1 General |
54 | G.2 Echocardiographic studies G.3 Data collected |
55 | Annex H (informative) Assessment of implant thrombogenic and haemolytic potential H.1 Rationale H.2 General |
56 | Figure H.1—Example of integrated thrombus and haemolytic potential assessment approach H.3 Experimental flow field assessment H.3.1 General |
57 | H.3.2 Test apparatus requirements H.3.3 Test procedure |
58 | Figure H.2—Example imaging planes (axial view) for symmetric trileaflet (left) and a symmetric D-shaped (right) valve H.3.4 Test report |
59 | H.4 Computational flow field assessment H.4.1 General H.4.2 Computational Model |
60 | H.4.3 Error analysis and estimation |
61 | Figure H.3—Examples of flow domains for aortic/pulmonary valve (left) and mitral/tricuspid valve (right) Figure H.4—Example planes to be used for computational validation (intersections of planes define lines for comparison purposes) |
62 | H.4.4 Computational simulations H.4.5 Study report H.5 Ex vivo blood testing H.5.1 General |
63 | H.5.2 Test apparatus requirements H.5.3 Test procedure |
64 | H.5.4 Test report |
66 | Annex I (informative) Guidelines for hydrodynamic performance characterization by steady flow testing I.1 General I.2 Steady forward flow testing I.2.1 Measuring equipment accuracy I.2.2 Test apparatus requirements |
67 | Figure I.1—Standard nozzle, forward flow |
68 | Figure I.2—Forward flow nozzle gradients I.2.3 Test procedure I.2.4 Test report |
69 | I.3 Steady back flow leakage testing I.3.1 Measuring equipment accuracy I.3.2 Test apparatus requirements |
70 | Figure I.3—Standard nozzle, back flow |
71 | Figure I.4—Back flow nozzle leakage rates I.3.3 Test procedure I.3.4 Test report |
73 | Annex J (normative) Durability testing J.1 Rationale J.2 General |
74 | Figure J.1—Example of an integrated durability assessment J.3 Accelerated wear testing J.3.1 General |
75 | J.3.2 Sample requirements J.3.3 Test apparatus requirements J.3.4 Test procedure |
76 | J.3.5 Test report |
77 | J.4 Dynamic failure mode testing J.4.1 General J.4.2 Sample requirements J.4.3 Test apparatus requirements J.4.4 Test procedure |
78 | J.4.5 Test report |
79 | J.5 Real-time wear testing J.5.1 General J.5.2 Test apparatus requirements J.5.3 Test apparatus requirements J.5.4 Test procedure |
80 | J.5.5 Test report |
81 | Annex K (informative) Fatigue assessment K.1 General |
82 | Figure K.1—Example schematic of a structural component fatigue assessment using a stress-life or strain-life approach K.2 Determination of in vivo boundary conditions |
83 | K.3 Structural component stress/strain analysis |
84 | K.4 Material fatigue strength determination K.5 Fatigue safety factor or probability of fatigue fracture determination |
85 | K.6 Component fatigue demonstration test |
86 | Annex L (normative) Clinical investigation endpoints for heart valve replacement devices L.1 General L.2 Single endpoints L.2.1 General L.2.2 Safety L.2.3 Effectiveness |
87 | L.3 Heart failure hospitalization definition |
88 | L.4 Composite endpoints L.5 Timing of endpoints |
89 | Bibliography |