ASTM-D5126:2010 Edition

$44.96

D5126/D5126M-90(2010)e1 Standard Guide for Comparison of Field Methods for Determining Hydraulic Conductivity in Vadose Zone

Published By	Publication Date	Number of Pages
ASTM	2010	11

Guaranteed Safe Checkout

Category: ASTM

If you have any questions, feel free to reach out to our online customer service team by clicking on the bottom right corner. We’re here to assist you 24/7.
Email:[email protected]

Description

ASTM D5126/D5126M-90-e1-Reapproved2010

Historical Standard: Standard Guide for Comparison of Field Methods for Determining Hydraulic Conductivity in Vadose Zone

ASTM D5126/D5126M

Scope

1.1 This guide covers a review of the test methods for determining hydraulic conductivity in unsaturated soils and sediments. Test methods for determining both field-saturated and unsaturated hydraulic conductivity are described.

1.2 Measurement of hydraulic conductivity in the field is used for estimating the rate of water movement through clay liners to determine if they are a barrier to water flux, for characterizing water movement below waste disposal sites to predict contaminant movement, and to measure infiltration and drainage in soils and sediment for a variety of applications. Test methods are needed for measuring hydraulic conductivity ranging from 1 × 10⁻² to 1 × 10⁻⁸ cm/s, for both surface and subsurface layers, and for both field-saturated and unsaturated flow.

1.3 For these field test methods a distinction must be made between “saturated” (K_s) and “field-saturated” (K_fs) hydraulic conductivity. True saturated conditions seldom occur in the vadose zone except where impermeable layers result in the presence of perched water tables. During infiltration events or in the event of a leak from a lined pond, a “field-saturated” condition develops. True saturation does not occur due to entrapped air (1). The entrapped air prevents water from moving in air-filled pores that, in turn, may reduce the hydraulic conductivity measured in the field by as much as a factor of two compared to conditions when trapped air is not present (2). Field test methods should simulate the “field-saturated” condition.

1.4 Field test methods commonly used to determine field-saturated hydraulic conductivity include various double-ring infiltrometer test methods, air-entry permeameter test methods, and borehole permeameter tests. Many empirical test methods are used for calculating hydraulic conductivity from data obtained with each test method. A general description of each test method and special characteristics affecting applicability is provided.

1.5 Field test methods used to determine unsaturated hydraulic conductivity in the field include direct measurement techniques and various estimation methods. Direct measurement techniques for determining unsaturated hydraulic conductivity include the instantaneous profile (IP) test method and the gypsum crust method. Estimation techniques have been developed using borehole permeameter data and using data obtained from desorption curves (a curve relating water content to matric potential).

1.6 The values stated in either SI units or inch-pound units [presented in brackets] are to be regarded separately as standard. The values stated in each system may not be exact equivalents; therefore, each system shall be used independently of the other. Combining values from the two systems may result in non-conformance with the standard.

1.6.1 The gravitational system of inch-pound units is used when dealing with inch-pound units. In this system, the pound (lbf) represents a unit of force (weight), while the unit for mass is slugs. The rationalized slug unit is not given, unless dynamic (F = ma) calculations are involved.

1.7 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

1.8 This guide offers an organized collection of information or a series of options and does not recommend a specific course of action. This document cannot replace education or experience and should be used in conjunction with professional judgment. Not all aspects of this guide may be applicable in all circumstances. This ASTM standard is not intended to represent or replace the standard of care by which the adequacy of a given professional service must be judged, nor should this document be applied without consideration of a project’s many unique aspects. The word “Standard” in the title of this document means only that the document has been approved through the ASTM consensus process.

Keywords

air-entry permeameter; air-entry value; borehole permeameter; hydraulic conductivity; infiltrometer; vadose zone monitoring; Single ring infiltrometers; Soil; Unsaturated hydraulic conductivity; Vadose zone monitoring; Air entry permeameter; Borehole permeameter methods; Comparison techniques–soil/related environments; Contamination–soil; Crust method; Double-ring infiltrometers; Double-tube method; Field investigations; Field-saturated hydraulic conductivity; Field testing–ground water/aquifers; Flow and flow rate–soil/rock/related materials; Gypsum crust method; Hydraulic conductivity/transmissivity; Infiltrometers; Instantaneous profile (IP) method; Irrigation management; Irrigation piping; Landfill; Percolation; Permeameters; Saturated hydraulic conductivity

ICS Code

ICS Number Code 07.060 (Geology. Meteorology. Hydrology)

DOI: 10.1520/D5126_D5126M-90R10E01

PDF Catalog

PDF Pages	PDF Title
1	Scope
2	Referenced Documents Terminology Summary of Guide
3	FIG. 1 FIG. 2
5	Significance and Use Report
6	FIG. 3 FIG. 4
7	Precision and Bias
8	TABLE 1
9	Keywords FIG. 5
10	REFERENCES FIG. 6 FIG. 7

Additional information

Standard Title	D5126/D5126M-90(2010)e1 Standard Guide for Comparison of Field Methods for Determining Hydraulic Conductivity in Vadose Zone
Published Code	ASTM
Publication Date	2010
Pages Count	11