BS EN 31010:2010
$215.11
Risk management. Risk assessment techniques
Published By | Publication Date | Number of Pages |
BSI | 2010 | 94 |
This International Standard is a supporting standard for ISO 31000 and provides guidance on selection and application of systematic techniques for risk assessment.
Risk assessment carried out in accordance with this standard contributes to other risk management activities.
The application of a range of techniques is introduced, with specific references to other international standards where the concept and application of techniques are described in greater detail.
This standard is not intended for certification, regulatory or contractual use.
This standard does not provide specific criteria for identifying the need for risk analysis, nor does it specify the type of risk analysis method that is required for a particular application.
This standard does not refer to all techniques, and omission of a technique from this standard does not mean it is not valid. The fact that a method is applicable to a particular circumstance does not mean that the method should necessarily be applied.
NOTE This standard does not deal specifically with safety. It is a generic risk management standard and any references to safety are purely of an informative nature. Guidance on the introduction of safety aspects into IEC standards is laid down in ISO/IEC Guide 51.
PDF Catalog
PDF Pages | PDF Title |
---|---|
6 | English CONTENTS |
8 | INTRODUCTION |
9 | 1 Scope 2 Normative references 3 Terms and definitions 4 Risk assessment concepts 4.1 Purpose and benefits |
10 | 4.2 Risk assessment and the risk management framework 4.3 Risk assessment and the risk management process |
13 | 5 Risk assessment process 5.1 Overview Figures Figure 1 – Contribution of risk assessment to the risk management process |
14 | 5.2 Risk identification 5.3 Risk analysis |
17 | 5.4 Risk evaluation |
18 | 5.5 Documentation |
19 | 5.6 Monitoring and reviewing risk assessment 5.7 Application of risk assessment during life cycle phases 6 Selection of risk assessment techniques 6.1 General 6.2 Selection of techniques |
20 | 6.3 Application of risk assessment during life cycle phases 6.4 Types of risk assessment techniques |
23 | Annex A (informative) Comparison of risk assessment techniques |
24 | Tables Table A.1 – Applicability of tools used for risk assessment |
25 | Table A.2 – Attributes of a selection of risk assessment tools |
29 | Annex B (informative) Risk assessment techniques |
36 | Table B.1 – Example of possible HAZOP guidewords |
39 | Figure B.1 – Dose-response curve |
51 | Figure B.2 – Example of an FTA from IEC 60300-3-9 |
54 | Figure B.3 – Example of an event tree |
57 | Figure B.4 – Example of cause-consequence analysis |
59 | Figure B.5 – Example of Ishikawa or Fishbone diagram |
60 | Figure B.6 – Example of tree formulation of cause-and-effect analysis |
66 | Figure B.7 – Example of human reliability assessment |
68 | Figure B.8 – Example bow tie diagram for unwanted consequences |
72 | Figure B.9 – Example of system Markov diagram Table B.2 – Markov matrix |
73 | Figure B.10 – Example of state transition diagram |
74 | Table B.3 – Final Markov matrix |
76 | Table B.4 – Example of Monte Carlo simulation |
79 | Figure B.11 – Sample Bayes’ net Table B.5 – Bayes’ table data Table B.6 – Prior probabilities for nodes A and B Table B.7 – Conditional probabilities for node C with node A and node B defined |
80 | Table B.8 – Conditional probabilities for node D with node A and node C defined Table B.9 – Posterior probability for nodes A and B with node D and node C defined Table B.10 – Posterior probability for node A with node D and node C defined |
81 | Figure B.12 – The ALARP concept |
86 | Figure B.13 – Part example of a consequence criteria table Figure B.14 – Part example of a risk ranking matrix |
87 | Figure B.15 – Part example of a probability criteria matrix |
92 | Bibliography |