BS EN 61000-4-21:2011
$215.11
Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) – Testing and measurement techniques. Reverberation chamber test methods
Published By | Publication Date | Number of Pages |
BSI | 2011 | 112 |
IEC 61000-4-21:2011 considers tests of immunity and intentional or unintentional emissions for electric and/or electronic equipment and tests of screening effectiveness in reverberation chambers. It establishes the required test procedures for performing such tests. Only radiated phenomena are considered. The objective of IEC 61000-4-21:2011 is to establish a common reference for using reverberation chambers to evaluate the performance of electric and electronic equipment when subjected to radio-frequency electromagnetic fields and for determining the levels of radio-frequency radiation emitted from electric and electronic equipment. IEC 61000-4-21:2011 does not intend to specify the tests to be applied to a particular apparatus or system. Its main aim is to give a general basic reference to all concerned product committees of the IEC. The product committees should select emission limits and test methods in consultation with CISPR. The product committees remain responsible for the appropriate choice of the immunity tests and the immunity test limits to be applied to their equipment. Other methods, such as those covered in IEC 61000-4-3, CISPR 16-2-3 and CISPR 16-2-4 may be used. This second edition cancels and replaces the first edition published in 2003. This edition constitutes a technical revision and includes the following significant technical changes with respectto the first edition: – In Clause 8, the use and specifications of E-field probes for application to reverberation chambers has been added. – In Annex A, additional guidance and clarifications on the use of reverberation chambers at relatively low frequencies of operation (i.e., close to the lowest usable frequency of a given chamber) are given, and its implications on the estimation of field uncertainty are outlined. – In Annex B, symmetric location of the field probes when the chamber exhibits cylindrical symmetry has been disallowed, as such placement could otherwise yield a false indication of field uniformity and chamber performance at different locations. – Annex C now contains more quantitative guidance on the setting of the maximum permissible stirring speeds that warrant quasi-static conditions of operation for chamber validation and testing. – In Annex D, a requirement for the EUT and equipment not to occupy more than 8 % of the total chamber volume in immunity testing has been added. – Annex E has been extended with further guidance on the value of EUT directivity to be used in the estimation of radiated power and field. – In Annex I, some clarifications on antenna efficiency measurements have been added. – A new Annex K has been added that covers measurement uncertainty in reverberation chambers.
PDF Catalog
PDF Pages | PDF Title |
---|---|
7 | English CONTENTS |
9 | INTRODUCTION |
10 | 1 Scope 2 Normative references |
11 | 3 Terms, definitions and abbreviations 3.1 Terms and definitions |
14 | 3.2 Abbreviations |
15 | 4 General 5 Test environments and limitations |
16 | 6 Applications 6.1 Radiated immunity 6.2 Radiated emissions 6.3 Shielding (screening) effectiveness 7 Test equipment |
17 | 8 Chamber validation |
18 | 9 Testing 10 Test results, test report and test conditions |
19 | Annex A (informative) Reverberation chamber overview |
36 | Figure A.5 – Typical reverberation chamber facility Figure A.6 – Theoretical sampling requirements for 95 % confidence |
37 | Figure A.7 – Normalized PDF of an electric field component at a fixed location for a measurement with a single sample Figure A.8 – Normalised PDF of the mean of an electric field component at one fixed location for a measurement with N independent samples |
38 | Figure A.9 – Normalised PDF of the maximum of an electric field component at a fixed location for a measurement with N independent samples |
39 | Figure A.10 – Chamber working volume Figure A.11 – Typical probe data |
41 | Figure A.14 – Distribution of absorbers for loading effects test Figure A.15 – Magnitude of loading from loading effects test |
42 | Figure A.16 – Standard deviation data of electric field components for eight probes in the loaded chamber |
43 | Annex B (normative) Chamber validation for mode-tuned operation |
50 | Tables Table B.1 – Sampling requirements Table B.2 – Field uniformity tolerance requirements |
51 | Figure B.1 – Probe locations for chamber validation |
52 | Annex C (normative) Chamber validation and testing for mode-stirred operation |
57 | Figure C.1 – Received power (dBm) as a function of tuner rotation (s) at 500 MHz Figure C.2 – Received power (dBm) as a function of tuner rotation (s) at 1 000 MHz |
58 | Annex D (normative) Radiated immunity tests |
62 | Figure D.1 – Example of suitable test facility |
63 | Annex E (normative) Radiated emissions measurements |
68 | Figure E.1 – Example of suitable test facility |
69 | Figure E.2 – Relating to the calculation of the geometry factor for radiated emissions |
70 | Annex F (informative) Shielding effectiveness measurements of cable assemblies, cables, connectors, waveguides and passive microwave components |
74 | Annex G (informative) Shielding effectiveness measurements of gaskets and materials |
82 | Figure G.1 – Typical test set-up Figure G.2 – Typical test fixture installation for gasket and/or material testing |
83 | Figure G.3 – Test fixture configured for validation |
84 | Annex H (informative) Shielding effectiveness measurements of enclosures |
90 | Figure H.1 – Typical test enclosure installation for floor mounted enclosure testing Figure H.2 – Typical test enclosure installation for bench mounted enclosure testing |
91 | Annex I (informative) Antenna efficiency measurements |
93 | Annex J (informative) Direct evaluation of reverberation performance using field anisotropy and field inhomogeneity coefficients |
98 | Table J.1 – Typical values for total field anisotropy coefficients for ‘medium’ and ‘good’ reverberation quality |
99 | Figure J.1 – Theoretical and typical measured distributions for field anisotropy coefficients in a well-stirred chamber |
100 | Figure J.2 – Theoretical and typical measured distributions for field anisotropy coefficients in a poorly stirred chamber |
101 | Figure J.3 – Typical measured values for field anisotropy coefficients as a function of N in a well-stirred chamber |
102 | Annex K (informative) M easurement uncertainty for chamber validation – Emission and immunity testing |
107 | Figure K.1 – Average emitted power as a function of frequency for a typical unintentional radiator Figure K.2 – Estimated standard uncertainty |
108 | Figure K.3 – Mean normalized width (in dB) of a n% -confidence interval Figure K.4 – Individual mean-normalized interval boundaries (in linear units) for maximum field strength as a function of the number of independent stirrer positions N |
109 | Bibliography |