BS EN IEC 61280-2-8:2021
$167.15
Fibre optic communication subsystem test procedures – Digital systems. Determination of low BER using Q-factor measurements
Published By | Publication Date | Number of Pages |
BSI | 2021 | 36 |
IEC 61280-2-8:2021 is available as IEC 61280-2-8:2021 RLV which contains the International Standard and its Redline version, showing all changes of the technical content compared to the previous edition. IEC 61280-2-8:2021 specifies two main methods for the determination of low BER values by making accelerated measurements. These include the variable decision threshold method (Clause 5) and the variable optical threshold method (Clause 6). In addition, a third method, the sinusoidal interference method, is described in Annex B. This second edition cancels and replaces the first edition published in 2003. This edition constitutes a technical revision. This edition includes the following significant technical changes with respect to the previous edition: – correction of errors in Formula (8) in 5.5.2 and in a related formula in 5.5.3; – correction of errors in the references to clauses, subclauses, figures, procedures, and in the Bibliography; – alignment of the terms and definitions in 3.1 with those in IEC 61281-1.
PDF Catalog
PDF Pages | PDF Title |
---|---|
2 | undefined |
4 | European foreword Endorsement notice |
5 | English CONTENTS |
7 | FOREWORD |
9 | 1 Scope 2 Normative references 3 Terms, definitions, and abbreviated terms 3.1 Terms and definitions |
10 | 3.2 Abbreviated terms 4 Measurement of low bit-error ratios 4.1 General considerations Tables Table 1 – Mean time for the accumulation of 15 errorsas a function of BER and bit rate |
11 | 4.2 Background to Q-factor |
12 | Figures Figure 1 – Sample eye diagram showing patterning effects |
13 | 5 Variable decision threshold method 5.1 Overview Figure 2 – More accurate measurement technique using a DSO that samples noise statistics between eye centres |
14 | Figure 3 – Bit error ratio as a function of decision threshold level |
15 | Figure 4 – Plot of Q-factor as a function of threshold voltage |
16 | 5.2 Apparatus 5.3 Sampling and specimens 5.4 Procedure |
17 | Figure 5 – Set-up for the variable decision threshold method Figure 6 – Set-up of initial threshold level (approximately at the centre of the eye) |
18 | 5.5 Calculations and interpretation of results 5.5.1 Sets of data |
19 | 5.5.2 Convert BER using inverse error function Table 2 – BER as a function of threshold voltage |
20 | 5.5.3 Linear regression Table 3 – fi as a function of Di |
21 | 5.5.4 Standard deviation and mean 5.5.5 Optimum decision threshold 5.5.6 BER optimum decision threshold Table 4 – Values of linear regression constants Table 5 – Mean and standard deviation |
22 | 5.5.7 BER non-optimum decision threshold 5.5.8 Error bound 5.6 Test documentation 5.7 Specification information 6 Variable optical threshold method 6.1 Overview |
23 | 6.2 Apparatus 6.3 Items under test 6.4 Procedure for basic optical link Figure 7 – Effect of optical bias |
24 | 6.5 Procedure for self-contained system Figure 8 – Set-up for optical link or device test Figure 9 – Set-up for system test |
25 | 6.6 Evaluation of results Table 6 – Example of optical bias test |
26 | Figure 10 – Extrapolation of log BER as a function of bias |
27 | Annex A (normative) Calculation of error bound in the value of Q |
29 | Annex B (informative) Sinusoidal interference method B.1 Overview B.2 Apparatus B.3 Sampling and specimens |
30 | B.4 Procedure B.4.1 Optical sinusoidal interference method Figure B.1 – Set-up for the sinusoidal interference method by optical injection |
31 | B.4.2 Electrical sinusoidal interference method Table B.1 – Results for sinusoidal injection |
32 | B.5 Calculations and interpretation of results B.5.1 Mathematical analysis B.5.2 Extrapolation Figure B.2 – Set-up for the sinusoidal interference method by electrical injection |
33 | B.5.3 Expected results Figure B.3 – BER result from the sinusoidal interference method (data points and extrapolated line) |
34 | B.6 Documentation B.7 Specification information Figure B.4 – BER versus optical power for three methods |
35 | Bibliography |