BSI PD CEN/TR 17603-20-06:2022
$198.66
Space engineering. Assessment of space worst case charging handbook
Published By | Publication Date | Number of Pages |
BSI | 2022 | 62 |
Common engineering practices involve the assessment, through computer simulation (with software like NASCAP [RD.4] or SPIS [RD.5]), of the levels of absolute and differential potentials reached by space systems in flight. This is usually made mandatory by customers and by standards for the orbits most at risk such as GEO or MEO and long transfers to GEO by, for example, electric propulsion. The ECSS-E-ST-20-06 standard requires the assessment of spacecraft charging but it is not appropriate in a standard to explain how such an assessment is performed. It is the role of this document ECSS-E-HB-20-06, to explain in more detail important aspects of the charging process and to give guidance on how to carry out charging assessment by computer simulation. The ECSS-E-ST-10-04 standard specifies many aspects of the space environment, including the plasma and radiation characteristics corresponding to worst cases for surface and internal charging. In this document the use of these environment descriptions in worst case simulations is described. The emphasis in this document is on high level charging in natural environments. One aspect that is currently not addressed is the use of active sources e.g. for electric propulsion or spacecraft potential control. The tools to address this are still being developed and this area can be addressed in a later edition.
PDF Catalog
PDF Pages | PDF Title |
---|---|
2 | undefined |
9 | Introduction |
10 | 1 Scope |
11 | 2 References |
15 | 3 Terms, definitions and abbreviated terms 3.1 Terms from other documents 3.2 Abbreviated terms |
17 | 4 Surface charging 4.1 Fundamentals |
19 | 4.2 General methodology of surface charging analyses 4.2.1 Introduction 4.2.2 Necessity of 3D surface charging analyses |
20 | 4.2.3 Simulation process |
21 | 4.2.4 Assessment of simulation results |
22 | 4.3 Electrostatic discharge 4.3.1 ESD types 4.3.2 Thresholds for ESD occurrence |
23 | 4.3.3 Quantitative characterization of ESD electrical transients |
27 | 4.3.4 Interpretation of results 4.4 Critical aspects with respect to worst case surface charging analyses 4.4.1 Orbit |
28 | 4.4.2 Material properties 4.4.3 Sunlit/Eclipse |
29 | 4.4.4 Protons 4.4.5 Electric propulsion 4.5 How to set up a simulation 4.5.1 Charging environment parameters 4.5.2 Modelling requirements for surface charging analyses |
30 | 4.5.3 Spacecraft geometry modelling |
31 | 4.5.4 Gmsh – The CAD interface to SPIS |
35 | 4.5.5 Physical groups and surface materials definition |
38 | 4.5.6 Basic electrical circuit of the satellite |
39 | 4.5.7 Plasma models 4.5.8 Global parameters 4.5.8.1 GEO orbits 4.5.8.2 LEO polar orbits |
40 | 4.5.8.3 Time-dependent potential variation 4.5.9 Consistency checks |
42 | 5 Internal Charging 5.1 Fundamentals 5.1.1 Introduction 5.1.2 Floating metals 5.1.3 Insulators |
43 | 5.1.4 Charge Deposition 5.1.5 Conductivity |
45 | 5.1.6 Time-dependence 5.2 General methodology 5.2.1 Introduction |
46 | 5.2.2 Internal charging analyses |
47 | 5.2.3 Critical aspects with respect to worst case internal charging analysis |
51 | 5.2.4 Modelling aspects for internal charging analyses 5.2.4.1 Choosing where simulation is necessary |
52 | 5.2.5 Environment 5.2.6 Geometry 5.2.6.1 1D Modelling |
53 | 5.2.6.2 3D modelling 5.2.7 Materials parameters 5.2.8 Simulation tools in 1D and 3D |
54 | 5.2.9 Scenarios 5.2.10 Important Outputs |
55 | 6 General aspects of surface and internal charging analysis 6.1 Material characterization aspects 6.2 Charging analyses and project phases 6.2.1 Phase 0: Mission analysis 6.2.2 Phase A: Feasibility 6.2.3 Phase B: Preliminary definition |
56 | 6.2.4 Phase C: Detailed definition 6.2.5 Phase D: Production 6.2.6 Phase E: Utilisation |