Shopping Cart

No products in the cart.

BSI PD CEN/TS 17458:2020:2021 Edition

$142.49

Ambient air. Methodology to assess the performance of receptor oriented source apportionment modelling applications for particulate matter

Published By Publication Date Number of Pages
BSI 2021 32
Guaranteed Safe Checkout
Categories: ,

If you have any questions, feel free to reach out to our online customer service team by clicking on the bottom right corner. We’re here to assist you 24/7.
Email:[email protected]

The European Directive on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe (2008/50/EC; AQD) identifies different uses for modelling: Assessment, planning, forecast and source apportionment (SA). This document addresses source apportionment modelling and specifies performance tests to check whether given criteria for receptor oriented source apportionment models (RM) are met. The scope of the tests set out in this document is the performance assessment of SA of particulate matter using RM in the context of the European Directives 2004/107/EC and AQD, including the Commission Implementing Decision 2011/850/EU of 12 December 2011. The application of RM does not quantify the spatial origin of particulate matter; hence, this document does not test spatial SA.

This document addresses RM users: practitioners of individual source apportionment studies as well as participants and organizers of source apportionment intercomparison studies. This document is suitable for the evaluation of results of a specific SA modelling system with respect to reference values (a priori known or calculated on the basis of intercomparison participants’ values) in the following application areas:

  • Assessment of performance and uncertainties of a modelling system or modelling system set up using the indicators laid down in this document.

  • Testing and comparing different source apportionment outputs in a specific situation (applying an evaluation data set) using the indicators laid down in this document.

  • QA/QC tests every time practitioners run a modelling system.

It should be noted for clarity that the procedures and calculations presented in this document cannot be used to check the performance of a specific SA modelling result without having any a priori reference information about the contributions of sources/source categories.

NOTE The application of this document implies that the intercomparison is organized and coordinated by an institution with the necessary technical capabilities and independence; the definition of which is beyond the scope of this document.

The principles of RM are summarized in Annex A. An overview of uncertainty sources and recommendations about steps to follow in SA studies are provided in Annex B and Annex C. For further information about SA methodologies, refer to e.g. [1; 2; 3].

There are methodologies different from RM which are widely used to accomplish SA, e.g. source oriented models. These other methodologies cover aspects of SA which are required in the AQD and are not addressed by RM (e.g. allocation of pollutants to geographic emission areas). Performance assessment of such methodologies is out of the scope of this document.

PDF Catalog

PDF Pages PDF Title
2 undefined
6 1 Scope
2 Normative references
7 3 Terms and definitions
9 4 Symbols and abbreviations
10 5 Fundamentals of the evaluation methodology
11 6 Arrays of tests
7 The performance assessment method
7.1 Evaluation data sets
7.2 Determination of the SCE reference values and their standard uncertainties
7.2.1 Consensus value from participants
12 7.2.2 Formulation of a consensus value from a synthetic data set
8 Performance indicators and other indicators
8.1 Complementary indicators
8.1.1 General
8.1.2 Apportioned pollutant mass
13 8.1.3 Number of identified sources
8.2 Similarity indicators
8.2.1 General
14 8.2.2 Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient
8.2.3 Standardized Identity Distance (SID, Annex I)
8.2.4 Weighted Distance (WD)
15 8.3 Performance indicators
8.3.1 General
8.3.2 z-scores for the average SCEs
16 8.3.3 RMSEu for the SCEs time series
8.3.4 Zeta-score for the uncertainty of the SCEs
17 Annex A (informative)Principle of receptor oriented models
18 Annex B (informative)Recommended steps for SA studies with receptor oriented models
19 Annex C (informative)Sources of uncertainty in receptor oriented models
20 Annex D (informative)Array of tests for individual SA runs(Responsible: Practitioner)
21 Annex E (normative)Array of tests for intercomparisons(Responsible: Coordinator)
22 Annex F (normative)Calculation of the SCE reference values Xkt and Xk in real-world data sets
23 Annex G (informative)Robust average and standard deviation
24 Annex H (informative)Acceptability range for complementary tests
25 Annex I (informative)Geometric meaning of the Standardized Identity Distance
27 Annex J (normative)Acceptability range for the similarity and performance tests
28 Annex K (informative)Intercomparison organization and test reports
BSI PD CEN/TS 17458:2020
$142.49