BSI PD CEN/TS 17458:2020:2021 Edition
$142.49
Ambient air. Methodology to assess the performance of receptor oriented source apportionment modelling applications for particulate matter
Published By | Publication Date | Number of Pages |
BSI | 2021 | 32 |
The European Directive on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe (2008/50/EC; AQD) identifies different uses for modelling: Assessment, planning, forecast and source apportionment (SA). This document addresses source apportionment modelling and specifies performance tests to check whether given criteria for receptor oriented source apportionment models (RM) are met. The scope of the tests set out in this document is the performance assessment of SA of particulate matter using RM in the context of the European Directives 2004/107/EC and AQD, including the Commission Implementing Decision 2011/850/EU of 12 December 2011. The application of RM does not quantify the spatial origin of particulate matter; hence, this document does not test spatial SA.
This document addresses RM users: practitioners of individual source apportionment studies as well as participants and organizers of source apportionment intercomparison studies. This document is suitable for the evaluation of results of a specific SA modelling system with respect to reference values (a priori known or calculated on the basis of intercomparison participants’ values) in the following application areas:
-
Assessment of performance and uncertainties of a modelling system or modelling system set up using the indicators laid down in this document.
-
Testing and comparing different source apportionment outputs in a specific situation (applying an evaluation data set) using the indicators laid down in this document.
-
QA/QC tests every time practitioners run a modelling system.
It should be noted for clarity that the procedures and calculations presented in this document cannot be used to check the performance of a specific SA modelling result without having any a priori reference information about the contributions of sources/source categories.
NOTE The application of this document implies that the intercomparison is organized and coordinated by an institution with the necessary technical capabilities and independence; the definition of which is beyond the scope of this document.
The principles of RM are summarized in Annex A. An overview of uncertainty sources and recommendations about steps to follow in SA studies are provided in Annex B and Annex C. For further information about SA methodologies, refer to e.g. [1; 2; 3].
There are methodologies different from RM which are widely used to accomplish SA, e.g. source oriented models. These other methodologies cover aspects of SA which are required in the AQD and are not addressed by RM (e.g. allocation of pollutants to geographic emission areas). Performance assessment of such methodologies is out of the scope of this document.
PDF Catalog
PDF Pages | PDF Title |
---|---|
2 | undefined |
6 | 1 Scope 2 Normative references |
7 | 3 Terms and definitions |
9 | 4 Symbols and abbreviations |
10 | 5 Fundamentals of the evaluation methodology |
11 | 6 Arrays of tests 7 The performance assessment method 7.1 Evaluation data sets 7.2 Determination of the SCE reference values and their standard uncertainties 7.2.1 Consensus value from participants |
12 | 7.2.2 Formulation of a consensus value from a synthetic data set 8 Performance indicators and other indicators 8.1 Complementary indicators 8.1.1 General 8.1.2 Apportioned pollutant mass |
13 | 8.1.3 Number of identified sources 8.2 Similarity indicators 8.2.1 General |
14 | 8.2.2 Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient 8.2.3 Standardized Identity Distance (SID, Annex I) 8.2.4 Weighted Distance (WD) |
15 | 8.3 Performance indicators 8.3.1 General 8.3.2 z-scores for the average SCEs |
16 | 8.3.3 RMSEu for the SCEs time series 8.3.4 Zeta-score for the uncertainty of the SCEs |
17 | Annex A (informative)Principle of receptor oriented models |
18 | Annex B (informative)Recommended steps for SA studies with receptor oriented models |
19 | Annex C (informative)Sources of uncertainty in receptor oriented models |
20 | Annex D (informative)Array of tests for individual SA runs(Responsible: Practitioner) |
21 | Annex E (normative)Array of tests for intercomparisons(Responsible: Coordinator) |
22 | Annex F (normative)Calculation of the SCE reference values Xkt and Xk in real-world data sets |
23 | Annex G (informative)Robust average and standard deviation |
24 | Annex H (informative)Acceptability range for complementary tests |
25 | Annex I (informative)Geometric meaning of the Standardized Identity Distance |
27 | Annex J (normative)Acceptability range for the similarity and performance tests |
28 | Annex K (informative)Intercomparison organization and test reports |