🔥🔥 Don’t Miss Out on Our End of Autumn Sale. If you have any questions, feel free to click the bottom right corner to contact our customer service..

Concat us[email protected]
Shopping Cart

No products in the cart.

🔍
BSI PD IEC/TR 62981:2017

BSI PD IEC/TR 62981:2017

$167.15

Studies and comparisons of magnetic measurements on grain-oriented electrical steelsheet determined by the single sheet test method and Epstein test method

Published By Publication Date Number of Pages
BSI 2017 42
PDF Format Searchable Printable Preview Now
Guaranteed Safe Checkout
Category:

If you have any questions, feel free to reach out to our online customer service team by clicking on the bottom right corner. We’re here to assist you 24/7.
Email:[email protected]

This document, which is a Technical Report, provides the results of international exercises and comparisons focusing on achieving the knowledge of the statistical performance of single sheet tester (SST) measurements made on grain-oriented electrical steel. These experiments aim at specifying obligatory reference values, measured by the single sheet test method, for the grading of high permeability (P grades) grain-oriented (g.-o.) materials, independently from the Epstein classification as it is practiced today. Besides this, Epstein test measurements have been made in order to gain more up-to-date statistical performance for comparison with the SST statistical characteristics. A few experiments were carried out aiming at improved knowledge on the systematic error performance of the SST, i.e. they were to determine the correlation between the quality of insulation separating laminations in the SST yokes and the measured loss.

There are various designations for “non-oriented electrical sheet steel” and for “grain-oriented electrical sheet steel” in use, for example in the IEC 60404 classification and specification standards, and there are also abbreviations like CGOS (for conventional grain-oriented steel) often used in industry. In this report, the following designations and abbreviations are used:

  • electrical steel as generic term;

  • n.-o- electrical steel and g.-o. electrical steel as generic terms for these two types;

  • S-type electrical streel or c. g.-o. electrical steel for “conventional grain-oriented electrical steel”;

  • P-type g.-o. electrical steel or high-permeability g.-o. electrical steel;

  • DR g.-o. electrical steel for “domain refined grain-oriented electrical steel”;

  • where two terms are used, it can depend on the context;

  • “electrical steel” can be replaced with “material”, depending on the context.

PDF Catalog

PDF Pages PDF Title
2 National foreword
6 CONTENTS
8 FOREWORD
10 1 Scope
2 Normative references
3 Terms and definitions
11 4 Background
4.1 Historical background and former concepts of the SST-Epstein relationship
Figures
Figure 1 – Epstein frame and single sheet tester, schematic view, windings partly omitted
12 4.2 Establishing reference values for grain-oriented electrical steels determined by independent SSTs – A new approach to the purpose
13 5 Preliminary comparisons and experiments
5.1 General
14 5.2 Comparison of the relative difference δPSE = (PSST – Peps)/PEps measured by steel manufacturers on their own products using own set-ups
Figure 2 – Relative difference δPSE = 100 (PSST – PEP) / PEP versus peak magnetic polarization J measured by six contributors on samples of their own products
15 5.3 Preliminary comparisons and experiments made by four Chinese laboratories using six SSTs with stacked yokes
Figure 3 – Contact pattern for the measurement of lamination resistance in the air gap of SST yokes
16 Figure 4 – Ratio of the power loss PSST to that of the SST with the best yokes, PSSTopt, versus lamination conductivity factor CY of the yokes
17 5.4 Necessity of comparing independent SST results
Figure 5 – Ratio of the power loss at 100 Hz to that at 40 Hz, P100/P40, at 1,7 T, versus lamination conductivity factor CY of the yokes
18 Figure 6 – Relative difference δPSE = 100(PSST – PEP) / PEP versus magnetic polarization
Figure 7 – Relative difference δPSE = 100(PSST – PEP) / PEP at 1,7 T determined by three standard laboratories, IEN, NPL and PTB, on S- and P-type g.-o. sample pairs
19 6 International comparison of SST measurements on grain-oriented electrical steel and accompanying Epstein measurements
6.1 General conditions, samples, participants
Figure 8 – Dispersion of manufacturer’s grain-oriented material production in form of Epstein samples (PTB 1999)
20 6.2 Circulation of the samples and measurement procedure
Tables
Table 1 – Participating laboratories
21 6.3 Results and analysis of the measured quantities
Table 2 – Circulated grain-oriented electrical steel test samples
22 Figure 9 – Example of scattering of the laboratories’ best estimates around the reference value (CGO sample No. 2, unweighted average, dash-dotted line)
23 Figure 10 – Example of scattering of the laboratories’ best estimates around the reference value (HGO sample No. 4, unweighted average, dash-dotted line)
Figure 11 – Example of scattering of the laboratories’ best estimates around the reference value (HGO sample No. 5, unweighted average, dash-dotted line)
24 Figure 12 – Samples No. 1 to No. 5: ratio of SST to Epstein power loss reference values δPSE(Jp) = (<PSST> – <PEpst>) / <PEpst> at 50 Hz versus peak polarization
25 Table 3 – Reference values at 50 Hz for the power loss P and the apparent power S
26 Table 4 – Standard deviations associated with the reference values at 50 Hzfor the power loss P and the apparent power S (Table 3)
Table 5 – Reference values at 50 Hz of the polarization at H = 800 A/m J800 and standard deviation of the distribution of the laboratories’ best estimates
27 Figure 13 – Overall dispersion (all labs, Jp values, and samples) of the laboratories’ best estimates Pi of the power loss at 50 Hz around their reference values
28 Figure 14 – Overall dispersion (all labs, Jp values, and samples)of the laboratories’ best estimates Si of the apparent power at 50 Hzaround their reference values, with and without outliers
29 Figure 15 – Dispersion around the reference value of the laboratories’ best values of the power loss P measured at 50 Hz by the Epstein and the SST methods at 1,7 T
30 Figure 16 – Dispersion around the reference value of the laboratories’ best values of the apparent power S measured at 50 Hz by the Epstein and the SST methods at 1,7 T
31 Figure 17 – Overall dispersion (European metrological laboratories only, all Jp values and samples) of the laboratories’ best estimates Pi of the power loss at 50 Hz around their reference values, with and without outliers
Table 6 – Relative standard deviations of 50 Hz power loss P and apparentpower S distributions around their reference values
32 Figure 18 – Dispersion of the laboratories’ best estimatesof SST (a) and Epstein (b) power loss at 50 Hz
33 Figure 19 – Dispersion of the laboratories’ best estimates of SST (a)and Epstein (b) power loss at 50 Hz
34 6.4 Conclusions of the international comparison
Figure 20 – Dispersion of the laboratories’ best estimates, represented by the standard deviation σ of SST (red) and Epstein (blue) power loss (a) and apparent power (b) at 50 Hz, versus the peak value of the polarization, JP, summarizing Figures 18 and 1
35 7 Summary and conclusions
36 Bibliography

Related products

BSI PD IEC/TR 62981:2017
$167.15