BSI PD IEC TS 62736:2023
$198.66
Ultrasonics. Pulse-echo scanners. Simple methods for periodic testing to verify stability of an imaging system’s elementary performance
Published By | Publication Date | Number of Pages |
BSI | 2023 | 70 |
PDF Catalog
PDF Pages | PDF Title |
---|---|
2 | undefined |
4 | Blank Page |
5 | CONTENTS |
8 | FOREWORD |
10 | INTRODUCTION |
12 | 1 Scope |
13 | 2 Normative references 3 Terms and definitions |
17 | 4 Symbols and abbreviated terms 4.1 Symbols |
18 | Tables Table 1 – Overview to the symbols and definitions of the QA terms, other than those for the display |
19 | 4.2 Abbreviated terms Table 2 – Overview of the symbols and definitions of the display QA terms |
20 | 5 General recommendation 6 Environmental conditions Table 3 – Abbreviated terms |
21 | 7 Quality assurance levels 7.1 General Table 4 – Outline of tests by level |
22 | 7.2 Level 1 tests 7.3 Level 2 tests |
23 | 7.4 Level 3 tests 8 Equipment and data required 8.1 Phantoms and software 8.1.1 General 8.1.2 Phantoms for Level 2 and Level 3 quality assurance |
24 | 8.1.3 Additional phantom specifications for Level 2 quality assurance |
26 | 8.1.4 Additional phantom specifications for Level 3 quality assurance and optional Level 2 tests |
27 | 8.2 Image data 8.2.1 Digital-image data |
28 | 8.2.2 Image-archiving systems |
29 | 8.3 Expectations of system suppliers 9 Level 1 test methods |
30 | 10 Level 2 measurement methods 10.1 Mechanical inspection 10.2 Image uniformity for transducer element and channel integrity 10.2.1 General 10.2.2 Apparatus scanning procedures and system settings |
31 | 10.2.3 Image acquisition |
32 | 10.2.4 Analysis |
33 | 10.3 Randomly distributed high-contrast sphere visualization 10.3.1 Methodology Figures Figure 1 – Median-averaged image (right) and its lateral profile (left) |
35 | Figure 2 – Examples of portable apparatus for moving the transducer: a) and c) in equal, chosen increments or b) at a known rate |
36 | 10.3.2 Procedure Figure 3 – Example of visual estimation of the two defined depth zones in which spheres can be detected with two degrees of fidelity and clarity |
37 | Figure 4 – Additional examples of visual estimation of the depth Zone 1 and Zone 2, each of which represents a certain degree of fidelity and clarity (IEC 62791) |
38 | 10.3.3 Data recording 10.4 Image displays; system and interpretation; maximum relative depth of penetration; spatial resolution 10.5 Distance and other spatial measurements 11 Level 3 measurement methods 11.1 General |
39 | 11.2 Maximum relative depth of penetration 11.2.1 Assessment 11.2.2 Scanning system settings |
40 | 11.2.3 Image acquisition Figure 5 – Maximum relative depth of penetration – image acquisition |
41 | 11.2.4 Analysis |
42 | 11.2.5 Commentary Figure 6 – Mean digitized image-data value versus depth for the phantom image data (A(j)) and for the noise-image data (A'(j)) |
43 | 11.3 System-image display 11.3.1 General |
44 | 11.3.2 Level 1 tests of the US system and interpretation-station display Figure 7 – TG18-QA test pattern for visual evaluation testing [21],[33] |
45 | 11.3.3 Level 2 and Level 3 display tests Figure 8 – Examples of TG18-LN luminance patterns for luminance measurements [21] |
47 | Figure 9 – TG270-ULN uniformity and luminance test pattern (TG270-ULN8-127 with background 8-bit grey level 127 is shown) [33] Table 5 – Ultrasound image display QA tests |
48 | 11.4 Distance and other spatial measurements 11.4.1 General 11.4.2 Apparatus and scanning system settings 11.4.3 Image acquisition 11.4.4 Analysis 11.5 Performance in clinical use and evaluation of QA programme |
49 | Annexes Annex A (informative) Example phantoms for full coupling with curved arrays, particularly for image uniformity tests Figure A.1 – Example phantom for image-uniformity andmaximum relative depth of penetration tests |
50 | Figure A.2 – Example compact phantom for image uniformity tests |
51 | Figure A.3 – Photograph and drawing of a three-in-one phantom which provides for determination of distance measurement precision and bias, image-uniformity, very-low-echo sphere visualization, and depth of penetration [39] |
52 | Figure A.4 – Two temporally stable, inexpensive phantoms for image uniformity tests |
53 | Annex B (informative) Available analysis software B.1 Open source software for assessment or tracking of ultrasound image QA data |
54 | Figure B.1 – Example of data analysis for the transducer evaluated to generate Figure 1 |
55 | B.2 Example of QA control chart Table B.1 – Output of image uniformity analysis |
56 | Figure B.2 – Control chart for a dip in the middle of the profile for one transducer (TD) model, C9-4 and the specified serial number (S/N) |
57 | Annex C (informative) Electronic test methods and test methods provided by the manufacturers – Relation to clinical significance |
58 | Annex D (informative) Special considerations for 3D imaging transducers D.1 General D.2 2D transducers and 3D mechanically driven transducers operating in 2D imaging mode D.3 2D arrays operating in 3D imaging mode for determining LSNRmd values for reconstructed images as a function of depth or distance from the central plane D.4 Mechanically driven 3D transducers operating in 3D imaging mode |
59 | Annex E (informative) Example workbook database for tracking high-contrast, low-echo sphere visibility and luminance of the display |
60 | Table E.1 – Transducer record and baseline high-contrast, low-echo-sphere visualization test data |
61 | Table E.2 – Database of periodic sphere visualization results |
62 | Table E.3 – Completed short QA data entry example form for monitor luminance evaluation using test pattern – QA18 |
63 | Table E.4 – Blank, short QA data entry evaluation form for monitor luminance using test pattern – QA18 |
64 | Table E.5 – Analysis of luminance measurements |
65 | Figure E.1 – Current and previous measurements and trendlines providing luminance at various grey levels, fractional slope of luminance and deviation from DICOM GSDF in ΔJND per grey level (IEC 62563-2) |
66 | Bibliography |