BSI PD IEC TS 63042-202:2021
$215.11
UHV AC transmission systems – UHV AC Transmission line design
Published By | Publication Date | Number of Pages |
BSI | 2021 | 114 |
This part of IEC 63042 provides common rules for the design of overhead transmission lines with the highest voltages of AC transmission systems exceeding 800 kV, so as to provide safety and proper functioning for the intended use.
This technical specification aims to give the main principles for the design of UHV AC overhead transmission lines, mainly including selection of clearance, insulation coordination and insulator strings design, bundle-conductor selection, earth wire/optical ground wires selection, tower and foundation design, environmental consideration. The design criteria apply to new construction, reconstruction and expansion of UHV AC overhead transmission line.
PDF Catalog
PDF Pages | PDF Title |
---|---|
2 | undefined |
4 | CONTENTS |
12 | FOREWORD |
14 | 1 Scope 2 Normative references |
15 | 3 Terms and definitions 4 Symbols and abbreviations |
16 | 5 UHV AC transmission line requirements 5.1 General requirements 5.2 Reliability requirements 5.3 Electrical requirements 5.4 Security requirements 5.5 Safety requirements 5.6 Environmental impact 5.7 Economy |
17 | 6 Selection of clearance 6.1 General 6.2 Air gap, tower clearances (strike distance) 6.2.1 Power frequency voltage 6.2.2 Switching overvoltage 6.2.3 Lightning overvoltage |
18 | 6.3 Phase to phase spacing (Horizontal, Vertical) 6.4 Ground clearances – Statutory requirements, electric and magnetic field limits 6.5 Conductor-earth wire spacing, shielding angle – Lightning performance criteria |
19 | 7 Insulation coordination, insulator and insulator string design 7.1 General 7.2 Insulation requirements – electrical design considerations 7.3 Insulating materials, type of insulators |
20 | 7.4 Insulator string configurations for disc type insulators |
21 | 7.5 Mechanical design criteria of insulator strings and associated hardware fittings 8 Bundle-conductor selection 8.1 General 8.2 Conductor types |
22 | 8.3 Bundle conductor configurations 8.3.1 Number of sub-conductors 8.3.2 Bundle spacing 8.4 Conductor bundle selection process 8.4.1 Cross-section of conductor 8.4.2 Conductor ampacity |
23 | 8.4.3 Requirements for electromagnetic environment 8.4.4 Capital cost and loss evaluation 8.5 Mechanical strength |
24 | 8.6 Conductor accessories 8.6.1 General requirements for fittings 8.6.2 Type and design features of link fittings, vibration dampers, spacers |
25 | 9 Earth wire/OPGW selection 9.1 General 9.2 Type of earth wire/OPGW 9.3 Design Criteria/Requirements Specific to UHV Lines 9.4 Induced voltages on earth wire |
26 | 10 Tower and foundation design 10.1 General 10.2 Tower classification 10.2.1 General 10.2.2 Conductor configuration |
27 | Figures Figure 1 – Typical single circuit vertical configuration tower Figure 2 – Typical double circuit vertical configuration tower |
28 | Figure 3 – Typical single circuit horizontal configuration tower Figure 4 – Typical single circuit delta configuration tower |
29 | Figure 5 – Typical single circuit H-type tower Figure 6 – Typical double circuit danube configuration tower |
30 | Figure 7 – 1 200 kV single circuit vertical configuration tower Figure 8 – 1 200 kV single circuit horizontal configuration tower Figure 9 – 1 200 kV double circuit vertical Configuration tower |
31 | 10.2.3 Constructional features 10.2.4 Line deviation angle Figure 10 – 1 200 kV single circuit H-type tower (for gantry) |
32 | 10.2.5 Tower extensions 10.2.6 Specific requirements 10.3 Tower design 10.3.1 General 10.3.2 Selection of tower geometry based on electrical clearances |
33 | 10.3.3 Calculation of loads on tower 10.3.4 Analysis using software |
34 | 10.3.5 Full scale tower testing 10.3.6 Tower design methodology |
35 | 10.4 Foundation design 10.4.1 General Figure 11 – Tower design methodology |
36 | 10.4.2 Open cast type foundations 10.4.3 Raft type foundations |
37 | 10.4.4 Deep foundations (Pile/Well/Pier/Steel Anchor type) 11 Environmental considerations 11.1 General 11.2 Electric field 11.2.1 General 11.2.2 Reference level of electric field |
38 | 11.2.3 Prediction of electric field 11.2.4 Mitigation measures of electric field 11.3 Magnetic field 11.3.1 General 11.3.2 Reference level of magnetic field 11.3.3 Prediction of magnetic field |
39 | 11.3.4 Mitigation measures of magnetic field 11.4 Corona noise (audible noise with corona discharge) 11.4.1 General 11.4.2 Characteristics of corona noise 11.4.3 Reference level of corona noise |
40 | 11.4.4 Prediction of corona noise 11.4.5 Mitigation measures of corona noise 11.5 Radio interference with corona discharge 11.5.1 General 11.5.2 Characteristics of radio interference |
41 | 11.5.3 Reference level of radio interference 11.5.4 Prediction of radio interference 11.5.5 Mitigation measures of radio interference 11.6 Wind noise |
42 | Annex A (informative)Experimental results and considerations on environmental performance of UHV AC transmission lines in different countries A.1 General A.2 Experimental results and considerations on environmental performance of UHV AC transmission lines in China A.2.1 Radio interference A.2.2 Audible noise Tables Table A.1 – Design limits for radio interference in China Table A.2 – Criteria for environmental noises in the five categoriesof areas in cities (dB (A)) |
43 | A.2.3 Electric field A.3 Experimental results and considerations on environmental performance of UHV AC transmission lines in India A.3.1 Electrical Clearances from buildings, structures, etc. A.3.2 Electric field A.3.3 Radio interference A.3.4 Audible noise |
44 | A.4 Experimental results and considerations on environmental performance of UHV AC transmission lines in Japan A.4.1 General A.4.2 AN (audible noise) |
45 | A.4.3 RI (Radio Interference) A.4.4 EMF (Electromagnetic field) |
46 | Figure A.1 – Results of sensing tests under transmission lines Table A.3 – Reference level of electric field and ground height of conductor |
47 | A.4.5 Electromagnetic induction interference, Electrostatic induction interference A.4.6 Wind noise from conductor |
48 | A.4.7 Ice and snow falling from conductor Figure A.2 – Symbols related to wind noise prediction formula |
49 | A.4.8 Landscape impact |
50 | A.4.9 Nature conservation |
52 | Annex B (informative)Design practice of UHV AC transmission lines in different countries B.1 General B.2 Design practice in China B.2.1 General B.2.2 Conductor and earth wire Table B.1 – Conductor type selection |
53 | Table B.2 – Conductor characteristics |
54 | B.2.3 Electrical clearances Table B.3 – Coefficient ki |
55 | B.2.4 Insulation coordination Figure B.1 – Composite insulator profiles |
56 | Table B.4 – Recommended configuration of tension insulatorstring in light and medium ice zone Table B.5 – Recommended configuration of tension insulatorstring in substation outlet span |
57 | Figure B.2 – 1 200 kV insulator profile Table B.6 – Recommended value of single circuit line air gap Table B.7 – Recommended value of double circuit line air gap |
58 | B.2.5 Tower and foundation |
60 | B.3 Design practice in India B.3.1 General B.3.2 Challenges in development and solutions B.3.3 Conductor selection |
61 | Table B.8 – Conductor capacity Table B.9 – Conductor surface gradient Table B.10 – Conductor radio interference Table B.11 – Conductor audible noise |
62 | B.3.4 Electrical clearances Figure B.3 – 1 200 kV air-gap experimental tests Table B.12 – Conductor electric field |
63 | B.3.5 Insulation requirements Table B.13 – Salient results of the experimental tests |
64 | B.3.6 1 200 kV test line Figure B.4 – 1 200 kV single circuit test line |
65 | B.3.7 400 kV double circuit (upgradable to 1 200 kV single circuit) line Figure B.5 – 1 200 kV double circuit test line Table B.14 – Salient features of the 1 200 kV test lines |
66 | Figure B.6 – 1 200 kV upgradable line –Suspension tower Figure B.7 – 1 200 kV upgradable line –Tension tower |
67 | B.4 Design practice in Japan B.4.1 General Figure B.8 – 1 200 kV Tower Prototype Testing Table B.15 – Salient features of 1 200 kV upgraded transmission line |
68 | B.4.2 Conductor and earth wire Figure B.9 – UHV AC transmission lines in Japan Table B.16 – UHV AC transmission lines in Japan Table B.17 – Conductor configuration and AN |
69 | B.4.3 Insulation coordination Figure B.10 – Shape of conductor Figure B.11 – Shape of OPGW |
70 | Table B.18 – Specifications of insulator Table B.19 – Withstand voltage of single insulator in pollution [kV/unit] Table B.20 – Withstand voltage of single insulator under snow [kV/unit] |
71 | Table B.21 – Altitude correction factor K1 |
72 | B.4.4 Wind noise |
73 | B.4.5 Tower and foundation |
74 | Table B.22 – Loads for tower design |
75 | Figure B.12 – Foundation type |
76 | Annex C (informative)Construction practice of UHV AC transmission lines in different countries C.1 General C.2 Construction practice in China Figure C.1 – Machinery for foundation construction |
77 | C.3 Construction practice in India C.4 Construction practice in Japan |
79 | Annex D (informative)Flashover voltage test result for air clearances in different countries D.1 General D.2 Flashover voltage test result for air clearances in China D.2.1 50 % Power frequency flashover voltage test results for air clearances of transmission line structures Figure D.1 – The arrangement of power frequency flashover voltage testfor side-phase air clearances of 1 000 kV cat-head type towers Figure D.2 – The 50 % power frequency flashover voltage characteristic for air clearance from side-phase conductor to tower body for 1 000 kV cat-head type towers |
80 | Figure D.3 – The arrangement of power frequency flashover voltage testfor side-phase air clearances of 1 000 kV cup type towers Figure D.4 – The 50 % power frequency flashover voltage characteristicfor air clearance from side-phase conductor to tower body for 1 000 kV cuptype towers 1 000 kV cup type towers |
81 | Figure D.5 – The arrangement of power frequency flashover voltage testfor air clearances of 1 000 kV double-circuit lines Figure D.6 – The 50 % power frequency flashover voltage characteristicfor air clearance from middle-phase conductor with I-type stringto tower body for 1 000 kV double-circuit lines |
82 | D.2.2 50 % Switching impulse flashover voltage test results for air clearances of transmission line structures Figure D.7 – The arrangement of the power frequency flashover voltage test for air clearances of bottom-phase with I-type string of 1 000 kV double-circuit lines Figure D.8 – The power frequency flashover voltage characteristicof air clearance from bottom-phase conductor (with I-type string)to tower body of 1 000 kV double-circuit lines |
83 | Figure D.9 – The arrangement of switching impulse flashover voltage testfor side-phase air clearances of 1 000 kV cat-head type towers Figure D.10 – The 50 % switching impulse flashover voltage characteristicfor air clearances from conductor to tower body of 1 000 kV lines(with a time to peak of 250 µs) Table D.1 – Switching impulse flashover voltages of side-phase air clearancesof 1 000 kV cat-head type towers with different test time to peak |
84 | Figure D.11 – The arrangement of switching impulse flashover voltage testfor middle-phase air clearances of 1 000 kV cat-head type towers Figure D.12 – The arrangement of switching impulse flashover voltage test for side-phase air clearances of 1 000 kV cup type towers Table D.2 – The switching impulse flashover voltage of air clearancesfrom middle-phase conductor to tower for 1 000 kV full-scale towers |
85 | Figure D.13 – The 50 % switching impulse flashover voltage characteristicfor air clearances from conductor to tower body of 1 000 kV lines(with a time to peak of 250 µs) Figure D.14 – The arrangement of switching impulse flashover voltage test for middle-phase air clearances of 1 000 kV cup type towers Table D.3 – The switching impulse flashover voltage for air clearancefrom the middle-phase conductor to tower window in the arrangementshown in Figure D.14 a) and Figure D.14 b) |
86 | Figure D.15 – The arrangement of switching impulse flashover voltagetest at long time to peak for middle-phase air clearances (with I-type string)of 1 000 kV double-circuit lines Figure D.16 – The 50 % switching impulse (1 000 μs) flashover voltage characteristicfor air clearances from conductor to bottom crossarm of 1 000 kV double-circuit lines(a distance of 9,0 m between conductor and middle crossarm) |
87 | Figure D.17 – The arrangement of switching impulse flashover voltage testfor air clearances from middle-phase conductor (with V-type string)to bottom crossarm of 1 000 kV double-circuit lines Figure D.18 – The 50 % switching impulse (1 000 μs) flashover voltage characteristic of air clearances from conductor to bottom crossarm of 1 000 kV double-circuit lines |
88 | Figure D.19 – The arrangement of switching impulse flashover testfor air clearances from middle-phase conductor (with V-type string)to tower body of 1 000 kV double-circuit lines Figure D.20 – The 50 % switching impulse (1 000 μs) flashover voltage characteristic for air clearances from conductor to tower body of 1 000 kV double-circuit lines |
89 | Figure D.21 – The arrangement of switching impulse flashover voltage testfor air clearances from middle-phase conductor (with V-type string)to middle crossarm of 1 000 kV double-circuit lines Figure D.22 – The 50 % switching impulse (1 000 μs) flashover voltage characteristic for air clearances from conductor to middle crossarm of 1 000 kV double-circuit lines |
90 | Figure D.23 – The arrangement of switching impulse flashover voltage testfor air clearances from bottom-phase conductor (with V-type string)to crossarm of 1 000 kV double-circuit lines Figure D.24 – The 50 % switching impulse (1 000 μs) flashover voltage characteristic for air clearances from conductor to crossarm of 1 000 kV double-circuit lines |
91 | D.2.3 50 % Lightning impulse flashover voltage test results for air clearances of transmission line structures Figure D.25 – The arrangement of switching impulse flashover voltage testfor air clearances from bottom-phase conductor (with V-type string)to tower body of 1 000 kV double-circuit lines Figure D.26 – The 50 % switching impulse (1 000 μs) flashover voltage characteristic for air clearances from conductor to tower body of 1 000 kV double-circuit lines |
92 | Figure D.27 – The 50 % lightning impulse flashover voltage characteristic for air clearances from side-phase conductor to tower body of 1 000 kV single-circuit lines Figure D.28 – The arrangement of lightning impulse flashover voltage testfor air clearances from middle-phase conductor (with I-type string)to bottom crossarm of 1 000 kV double-circuit lines |
93 | Figure D.29 – The 50 % lightning impulse flashover voltage characteristic for air clearances from conductor to lower crossarm of 1 000 kV double-circuit lines Figure D.30 – The arrangement of lightning impulse flashover voltage testfor air clearances from middle-phase conductor (with V-type string)to bottom crossarm of 1 000 kV double-circuit lines |
94 | D.2.4 Effects of switching overvoltage time to peak on flashover voltage Figure D.31 – The 50 % positive and negative lightning impulseflashover voltage characteristic for air clearances from conductorto lower crossarm of 1 000 kV double-circuit lines Figure D.32 – Curve of the 50 % switching impulse flashover voltage as a function of the time to peak for the air clearance from conductor to tower leg of 5 m |
95 | D.2.5 Tower width correction approaches for air clearances of transmission line structures |
96 | Figure D.33 – Tower-width voltage correction factor Figure D.34 – Tower-width spacing correction factor |
97 | D.4 Flashover voltage test result for air clearances in Japan D.4.1 50 % Power frequency flashover voltage test results of transmission line structures D.3 Flashover voltage test result for air clearances in India Figure D.35 – Effects of tower leg width on switching impulse flashover voltage(with a time to peak of 720 μs) |
98 | D.4.2 50 % Switching impulse flashover voltage test results for air clearances of transmission line structures Figure D.36 – The 50 % power frequency flashover voltage characteristicfor air clearance for 1 000 kV Table D.4 – Altitude correction factor K1 Table D.5 – Gap coefficient k |
99 | Figure D.37 – The arrangement of switching impulse flashover voltage testfor air clearances of 1 000 kV tension type towers Table D.6 – Altitude correction factor K1 |
100 | Figure D.38 – The 50 % switching impulse flashover voltage characteristicfor air clearances of 1 000 kV tension type towers Figure D.39 – The arrangement of switching impulse flashover voltage testfor air clearances of 1 000 kV suspension I type towers |
101 | Figure D.40 – The 50 % switching impulse flashover voltage characteristic for air clearances from conductor to tower body of 1 000 kV suspension I type towers Figure D.41 – The arrangement of switching impulse flashover voltage testfor air clearances of 1 000 kV suspension V type towers |
102 | D.4.3 50 % lightning impulse flashover voltage test results for air clearances of transmission line structures Figure D.42 – The 50 % switching impulse flashover voltage characteristicfor air clearances of 1 000 kV suspension V type towers Table D.7 – Gap coefficient k |
103 | Figure D.43 – The 50 % Lightning impulse flashover voltage characteristicfor air clearance for 1 000 kV |
104 | Annex E (informative)Restrictions on electromagnetic environment ofUHV AC transmission lines in different countries E.1 General E.2 Restrictions in China E.3 Restrictions in India Table E.1 – Radio interference Table E.2 – Audible noise |
105 | E.4 Restrictions in Japan E.4.1 General E.4.2 RI (Radio Interference) E.4.3 AN (Audible Noise) E.4.4 Electric field Table E.3 – Electric field Table E.4 – Specific limits for noise of environmental regulation [dB(A)] |
106 | E.4.5 Magnetic field E.4.6 Communication failure due to electromagnetic induction or electrostatic induction E.4.7 Overvoltage due to electromagnetic induction |
107 | Annex F (informative)Anti-vibration measures for conductorsand earth wires in different countries F.1 General F.2 Anti-vibration measures in China Figure F.1 – Resonance frequency type vibration damper |
108 | F.3 Anti-vibration measures in India F.4 Anti-vibration measures in Japan F.4.1 Conductor F.4.2 Earth wire Table F.1 – Upper limit of everyday tension and anti-vibration measures for galvanized steel strand or aluminium clad steel strand |
109 | Figure F.2 – Shape of distributed damper |
110 | Annex G (informative)Earth wire regulations in different countries G.1 General G.2 Earth wires regulations in China G.3 Earth wires regulations in India G.4 Earth wires regulations in Japan |
112 | Bibliography |