FEMA P 2139 2 2020
$8.45
FEMA P-2139-2: Short-Period Building Collapse Performance and Recommendations for Improving Seismic Design Volume 2 – Study of One-to-Four Story Wood Light-Frame Buildings
Published By | Publication Date | Number of Pages |
FEMA | 2020 | 366 |
None
PDF Catalog
PDF Pages | PDF Title |
---|---|
1 | FEMA P-2139-2 |
3 | Short-Period Building Collapse Performance and Recommendations for Improving Seismic Design Volume 2 – Study of One-to-Four Story Wood Light-Frame Buildings |
5 | Foreword |
7 | Preface |
9 | Table of Contents |
13 | List of Figures |
27 | List of Tables |
37 | Chapter 1: Introduction |
38 | 1.1 Background and Purpose |
42 | 1.2 Approach and Scope |
47 | 1.3 Organization and Content |
49 | Chapter 2: Observed Response and Performance Benchmarks 2.1 Introduction |
50 | 2.2 Significant Earthquakes and Sources of Data 2.2.1 U.S. Earthquakes (1964 – 2014) |
55 | 2.2.2 World-Wide Earthquakes (1980 – 2014) 2.2.3 Building Records of Earthquake Response |
59 | 2.3 Overview of Methods Used to Establish Benchmark Properties of Short-Period Wood Light-Frame Buildings 2.3.1 Benchmark Response Properties 2.3.2 Benchmark Performance Properties |
61 | 2.3.3 Definitions and Relationship of Complete Structural Damage, Collapse, and Post-Earthquake Safety Evaluation Criteria |
69 | 2.4 Measured Periods of Wood Light-Frame Buildings |
73 | 2.5 Observed Damage and Collapse of Wood Light-Frame Buildings in the 1994 Northridge Earthquake |
84 | 2.6 Observed Collapse Performance of Buildings in the 1995 Kobe Earthquake |
94 | 2.7 Observed Performance of Full-Scale Wood Light-Frame Buildings in Shake Table Tests 2.7.1 Shake Table Tests of a Two-Story Japanese Home at the E-Defense Facility, Miki, Japan |
99 | 2.7.2 Shake Table Tests of a Two-Story Townhouse at the Structural Engineering and Seismic Simulation Laboratory, University at Buffalo |
103 | 2.8 Summary of Key Findings and Benchmark Properties of Short-Period Wood Light-Frame Buildings 2.8.1 Key Findings |
104 | 2.8.2 Response Behavior |
105 | 2.8.3 Collapse Performance |
107 | Chapter 3: Development of Building Archetype Configurations and Designs 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Factors Influencing Building Response and Performance |
108 | 3.2.1 Seismic Design Level 3.2.2 Building Age and Configuration |
109 | 3.2.3 Structural Component Properties |
110 | 3.2.4 Architectural and Nonstructural Components and Finishes |
111 | 3.2.5 Site Class and Foundation 3.2.6 Design and Construction Practice |
112 | 3.3 Building Types and Occupancies for Development of Archetypes 3.3.1 FEMA Model Building Types |
113 | 3.3.2 Commercial Buildings 3.3.3 Multi-Family Dwellings |
114 | 3.3.4 Single-Family Dwellings 3.4 Archetype Design Criteria and Representative Configurations 3.4.1 Gravity Loads |
115 | 3.4.2 Seismic Loads |
116 | 3.4.3 Foundation Design Criteria 3.4.4 Design Approach |
117 | 3.4.5 Representative Archetype Configurations |
119 | 3.5 Commercial Buildings |
122 | 3.6 Multi-Family Dwellings |
128 | 3.7 Single-Family Dwellings |
133 | Chapter 4: Numerical Modeling for Parametric Studies 4.1 Modeling Methods 4.1.1 Overview of Timber3D |
134 | 4.1.2 Typical Timber3D Models |
135 | 4.1.3 Nonlinear Wall Building Blocks |
138 | 4.1.4 Building Block Nonlinear Component Properties |
150 | 4.2 Overview of Parametric Studies and Variations in Archetypes |
154 | 4.3 Baseline Configuration Parametric Study |
155 | 4.4 Collapse Displacement Capacity Parametric Study |
156 | 4.5 Nonstructural Interior and Exterior Wall Finishes Parametric Study 4.6 Soil-Structure Interaction and Foundation Flexibility Parametric Study 4.6.1 Details of Modeling for SSI and Foundation Flexibility |
161 | 4.7 Backbone Curve Shape Parametric Study 4.7.1 Details of Modeling Backbone Curve Shape |
164 | 4.8 Analysis Methods 4.8.1 Overview 4.8.2 Free Vibration Analyses 4.8.3 Nonlinear Static Pushover Analyses |
165 | 4.8.4 Incremental Dynamic Analyses and Collapse Evaluation |
170 | 4.8.5 Peak Response Calculations |
171 | Chapter 5: Numerical Results of Parametric Studies 5.1 Overview of Results |
173 | 5.2 Baseline Configuration Parametric Study |
174 | 5.2.1 Baseline Configuration Archetypes and Variants 5.2.2 Numerical Results |
185 | 5.2.3 Interpretation of Results |
189 | 5.3 Collapse Displacement Capacity Parametric Study 5.3.1 Collapse Displacement Capacity Archetypes and Variants |
192 | 5.3.2 Numerical Results |
208 | 5.3.3 Interpretation of Results |
211 | 5.4 Nonstructural Interior and Exterior Wall Finishes Parametric Study |
212 | 5.4.1 Nonstructural Interior and Exterior Wall Finish Archetypes and Variants |
213 | 5.4.2 Numerical Results |
221 | 5.4.3 Interpretation of Results |
222 | 5.5 Soil-Structure Interaction and Foundation Flexibility Parametric Study |
223 | 5.5.1 Soil-Structure Interaction and Foundation Flexibility Archetypes and Variants |
224 | 5.5.2 Numerical Results |
231 | 5.5.3 Interpretation of Results |
235 | 5.6 Backbone Curve Shape Parametric Study 5.6.1 Backbone Curve Shape Archetypes and Variants |
236 | 5.6.2 Numerical Results |
244 | 5.6.3 Interpretation of Results |
245 | 5.7 Overarching Findings on Parametric Studies |
247 | Chapter 6: Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendations 6.1 Introduction 6.2 Key Findings of the Parametric Studies |
248 | 6.2.1 Baseline Configuration Study |
256 | 6.2.2 Collapse Displacement Capacity Parametric Study |
260 | 6.2.3 Nonstructural Interior and Exterior Wall Finishes Parametric Study |
262 | 6.2.4 Soil-Structure Interaction and Foundation Flexibility Parametric Study |
264 | 6.2.5 Backbone Curve Shape Parametric Study |
267 | 6.3 Conclusions and Recommendations |
268 | 6.3.1 Comparison with Prior FEMA P-695 Collapse Studies |
271 | 6.3.2 Recommendations for Improved Seismic Design Codes and Standards |
275 | 6.3.3 Recommendations for Advanced Seismic Design and Analysis Practices |
277 | 6.3.4 Recommendations for Enhanced Modeling and Testing |
281 | Appendix A: Archetype Design Criteria and Details A.1 Introduction A.2 Design of Wood Light-Frame Archetypes |
282 | A.2.1 Structural Properties for Engineered Designs |
284 | A.2.2 Wall Locations and Configurations |
285 | A.3 Commercial Building Shear Wall Designs |
289 | A.4 Multi-Family Dwelling Shear Wall Designs |
290 | A.4.1 One-Story Multi-Family Dwelling Shear Walls |
293 | A.4.2 Two-Story Multi-Family Dwelling Shear Walls |
297 | A.4.3 Four-Story Multi-Family Dwelling Shear Walls |
305 | A.5 Single-Family Dwelling Engineered Shear Wall Designs |
313 | A.6 Single-Family Dwelling Conventional Construction Shear Wall Designs |
315 | A.7 Foundation Designs for Wood Light-Frame Building Archetypes |
321 | Appendix B: Archive of Peak Response Calculations B.1 Peak Response Calculations from Parametric Studies B.2 Peak Response Calculations from the Study on Effect of Viscous Damping B.3 Response Parameters Archived for Each Model |
327 | Appendix C: Effect of Viscous Damping on Collapse Performance of Wood Light-Frame Archetypes C.1 Introduction C.2 Equation of Motion and Damping Model |
328 | C.2.1 Rayleigh Damping Model |
329 | C.2.2 Variation of Damping Ratios with Natural Periods |
330 | C.3 Sensitivity Study on Addition of Viscous Damping C.3.1 Modal and Pushover Analyses |
331 | C.3.2 Incremental Dynamic Analyses |
332 | C.4 Discussion |
335 | Appendix D: Validation Study D.1 Introduction D.2 Measured Response Behavior in the 2003 San Simeon Earthquake |
341 | D.3 Validation of Numerical Modeling D.3.1 Modeling and Scope |
342 | D.3.2 Main Findings – Model 1 |
344 | D.3.3 Main Findings – Model 2 |
347 | D.3.4 Summary of Findings |
349 | References |
361 | Project Participants |
366 | Back Cover |