IEEE 1175.4 2009
$58.50
IEEE Standard for CASE Tool Interconnections–Reference Model for Specifying System Behavior
Published By | Publication Date | Number of Pages |
IEEE | 2009 | 98 |
New IEEE Standard – Active. The reference model that provides a common interpretation basis by which tools can express and communicate the observable features of system/software behavior to users and to other tools is presented in this standard. This standard specifies a conceptual metamodel for understanding and describing the causal behavior for a system. The purpose of this conceptual metamodel is to express causal behavior and compositions of causal behavior in a model that integrates all observable operational features of a system into one behavior specification. This conceptual metamodel is useful for analyzing systems, for constructing particular system behavior models, and for using those models in the specification, design, and evaluation of engineered systems. It provides the necessary semantic elements for describing general hardware/software systems, including hardware-only, software-only, or mixed system components, and it allows these different types of components to be treated in a consistent manner, providing a basis for representing a wide variety of systems.
PDF Catalog
PDF Pages | PDF Title |
---|---|
1 | IEEE Std 1175.4-2008 Front cover |
3 | Title page
|
6 | Introduction |
9 | Notice to users Laws and regulations Copyrights |
10 | Updating of IEEE documents Errata Interpretations Patents |
11 | Participants
|
13 | Contents |
15 | Important notice 1. Overview 1.1 Scope 1.2 Purpose |
16 | 1.3 Applicability |
17 | 1.4 Engineering models and metamodels |
18 | 1.5 Audience 1.6 Conformance |
19 | 1.7 Organization of this standard 2. Normative references |
20 | 3. Special terms |
22 | 4. System behavior model requirements |
23 | 4.1 Application scope |
24 | 4.2 Declarative form |
25 | 4.3 Predictive ability |
28 | 4.4 Test creation ability |
29 | 4.5 Life cycle roles |
30 | 4.6 Common interpretation 5. System behavior metamodels 5.1 Developing the Conceptual and Data Metamodels for behavior modeling |
32 | 5.2 Using the Conceptual and Data Metamodels for behavior modeling |
33 | 6. Conceptual Metamodel foundations 6.1 Agent of behavior—Unit |
38 | 6.2 Percepts of unit behavior—Boundary interfaces |
44 | 6.3 Concepts of unit behavior—Behavior patterns |
67 | 6.4 Observables—Base quantities |
70 | 6.5 Composition of unit behavior—Build structures |
77 | 6.6 Prediction of unit behavior |
78 | 7. Conceptual Metamodel requirements 7.1 Requirements for metamodel organization |
85 | 7.2 Requirements for representing Boundary Interfaces |
86 | 7.3 Requirements for representing Behavior Patterns |
89 | 7.4 Requirements for representing Base Quantities |
92 | 7.5 Requirements for representing Build Structures |
94 | Annex A (informative) Bibliography |
95 | Annex B (informative) Comparison of the system behavior model with other engineering models B.1 Stakeholder requirements model |
96 | B.2 System use model |
97 | B.3 System mechanism model B.4 System implementation model B.5 System verification model |
98 | B.6 System validation model |