{"id":416610,"date":"2024-10-20T06:11:42","date_gmt":"2024-10-20T06:11:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/product\/uncategorized\/bs-iec-tr-63401-12022\/"},"modified":"2024-10-26T11:30:23","modified_gmt":"2024-10-26T11:30:23","slug":"bs-iec-tr-63401-12022","status":"publish","type":"product","link":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/product\/publishers\/bsi\/bs-iec-tr-63401-12022\/","title":{"rendered":"BS IEC TR 63401-1:2022"},"content":{"rendered":"
PDF Pages<\/th>\n | PDF Title<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2<\/td>\n | undefined <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
4<\/td>\n | CONTENTS <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
8<\/td>\n | FOREWORD <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
10<\/td>\n | INTRODUCTION <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
11<\/td>\n | 1 Scope <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
12<\/td>\n | 2 Normative references 3 Terms and definitions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
14<\/td>\n | 4 Characteristics of low short circuit ratio AC networks 4.1 Definition of low short circuit ratio 4.1.1 General <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
15<\/td>\n | 4.1.2 Low SCR in IEEE Std 1204-1997 4.1.3 Low SCR in CIGRE B4.62 TB671 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
17<\/td>\n | 4.2 Stability issues posed by inverter-based resources 4.2.1 General Figures Figure 1 \u2013 Measured voltage and current curves of sub-synchronous oscillation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
18<\/td>\n | 4.2.2 Static voltage control 4.2.3 Fault ride-through 4.2.4 Multi-frequency oscillation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
19<\/td>\n | 4.3 Summary 5 Identification of low short circuit ratio AC networks 5.1 Problem statement <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
20<\/td>\n | 5.2 Short circuit ratio for a single-connected REPP system 5.2.1 SCR calculation with fault current <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
21<\/td>\n | 5.2.2 SCR calculation with equivalent circuit Figure 2 \u2013 Schematic diagram of a WPP with no static or dynamic reactive support <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
22<\/td>\n | Figure 3 \u2013 Equivalent circuit representation of the WPP shown in Figure 2 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
26<\/td>\n | Figure 4 \u2013 A typical SIPES Figure 5 \u2013 Changes of system eigenvalues, and the weakest system eigenvalue\u2019s damping ratio with SCR in a SIPES <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
27<\/td>\n | Figure 6 \u2013 Schematic diagram of a WPP with static reactivesupport plant (capacitor banks) Figure 7 \u2013 Equivalent circuit representation of the WPP shown in Figure 6 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
28<\/td>\n | 5.3 Short circuit ratio for multi grid-connected WPP system 5.3.1 General Figure 8 \u2013 Schematic diagram of a WPP with dynamic reactivesupport plant (synchronous condensers) Figure 9 \u2013 Equivalent circuit representation of the WPP shown in Figure 8 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
29<\/td>\n | 5.3.2 Modal decoupling method <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
30<\/td>\n | Figure 10 \u2013 Mechanism illustration of decoupling a MIPESinto a set of equivalent SIPESs <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
31<\/td>\n | Figure 11 \u2013 A typical MIPES <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
35<\/td>\n | Figure 12 \u2013 A test wind farm system that contains nine wind turbines <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
37<\/td>\n | Figure 13 \u2013 One-line diagram of 5-infeed PES Tables Table 1 \u2013 Rated capacity of PEDs in 5-infeed PES in p.u. <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
38<\/td>\n | Figure 14 \u2013 Eigenvalue comparison of 5-infeed PES and its 5 equivalent SIPESs Table 2 \u2013 Network parameters of 5-infeed PES in p.u. Table 3 \u2013 Relationship between equivalent SIPESs and eigenvaluesof Yeq in 5-infeed PES <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
39<\/td>\n | Figure 15 \u2013 The 9-converter heterogeneous system with a IEEE 39-bus network topology Table 4 \u2013 Control parameters of converters <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
40<\/td>\n | 5.3.3 Circuit aggregation method Figure 16 \u2013 The dominant eigenvalues and the damping ratios <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
41<\/td>\n | Figure 17 \u2013 Nearby WPP connected to the same region in a power system <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
42<\/td>\n | Figure 18 \u2013 Equivalent representation of multiple windfarmsconnecting to a power system with its Z matrix <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
43<\/td>\n | Figure 19 \u2013 Equivalent circuit representation of two WPPs connectedto the same connection point-configuration 2 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
44<\/td>\n | Figure 20 \u2013 Four WPPs integrated into the system with weak connections Table 5 \u2013 Wind capacity and SCR values assuming no interaction <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
45<\/td>\n | Figure 21 \u2013 Multiple WPPs connecting to the same HV busor HV buses in close proximity Figure 22 \u2013 Equivalent circuit representation of WPPs connecting to the same HV bus Figure 23 \u2013 Approximate equivalent representation assumed for CSCR method <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
47<\/td>\n | 5.4 Summary Table 6 \u2013 The definition of different MISCRs <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
48<\/td>\n | Table 7 \u2013 Comparison of SCR methods <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
49<\/td>\n | 6 Steady state voltage stability issue for low short circuit ratio AC networks 6.1 Problem statements 6.2 Steady state stability analysis method 6.2.1 P-V curve Figure 24 \u2013 System topology Figure 25 \u2013 Typical P-V curve <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
50<\/td>\n | 6.2.2 Q-V curve Figure 26 \u2013 System topology Figure 27 \u2013 Typical Q-V curve <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
51<\/td>\n | 6.2.3 Voltage sensitivity analysis Figure 28 \u2013 Simplified equivalent circuit oflarge-scale wind power integration system <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
53<\/td>\n | Figure 29 \u2013 Voltage sensitivity at PCC of large-scale wind power integration system <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
54<\/td>\n | Figure 30 \u2013 Single generator connected to an infinite bus via grid impedance <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
55<\/td>\n | Figure 31 \u2013 P-V curves for a typical generator in a weak grid <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
56<\/td>\n | 6.2.4 Relation to short circuit ratio <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
58<\/td>\n | 6.3 Control strategy for inverter-based resource 6.3.1 Active power and reactive power control <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
60<\/td>\n | 6.3.2 Voltage control Figure 32 \u2013 Power limit curve of DFIG <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
61<\/td>\n | 6.4 Case study 6.4.1 Steady state voltage stability problem \u2013 China Figure 33 \u2013 Voltage control block diagram of the doubly-fed wind turbine Figure 34 \u2013 Network structure of Baicheng grid <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
62<\/td>\n | Figure 35 \u2013 Short circuit capacity of Baicheng network <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
63<\/td>\n | Figure 36 \u2013 P-V curves and V-Q curves Table 8 \u2013 Wind farm\u2019s maximum power under different conditions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
64<\/td>\n | 6.4.2 Low SCR interconnection experience \u2013 Vestas Figure 37 \u2013 Reactive power of the wind farm and voltage level at the PCC <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
65<\/td>\n | 6.5 Summary Figure 38 \u2013 Schematic representation of the study system <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
66<\/td>\n | 7 Transient issue for low short circuit ratio AC networks 7.1 Problem statement Figure 39 \u2013 Fault characteristics <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
67<\/td>\n | 7.2 Transient characteristic modelling and analysis 7.2.1 Transient stability analysis tools and limitations <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
68<\/td>\n | 7.2.2 Electromagnetic transient (EMT) type models Figure 40 \u2013 Comparison of VER fault response betweentransient stability and EMT models <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
69<\/td>\n | 7.2.3 Transient stability analysis model requirements 7.3 Fault ride-through protection and control issue 7.3.1 General <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
70<\/td>\n | 7.3.2 Hardware protection of inverter-based resource during fault <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
71<\/td>\n | Figure 41 \u2013 Doubly-fed wind turbine rotor-side crowbar protection circuit topology <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
73<\/td>\n | 7.3.3 Unbalancing-voltage ride-through issue <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
74<\/td>\n | Figure 42 \u2013 Schematic diagram of positive and negative sequence currentcontrol of DFIG converter under grid unbalanced fault <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
75<\/td>\n | 7.3.4 Overvoltage ride-through control strategy Figure 43 \u2013 Comparative analysis of simulation results <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
76<\/td>\n | Figure 44 \u2013 Overvoltage ride-through control flow diagram <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
77<\/td>\n | 7.3.5 Multiple fault ride-through Figure 45 \u2013 Multiple fault conditions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
78<\/td>\n | Figure 46 \u2013 Pitch angle control strategy <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
79<\/td>\n | Figure 47 \u2013 Typical characteristics of Pm and Pe under multiple fault ride-through <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
80<\/td>\n | 7.3.6 Under and over -voltage ride-through in time sequence Figure 48 \u2013 Characteristics of Pm and Pe under multiple fault ride-through Figure 49 \u2013 Under\/overvoltage ride-through curve <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
81<\/td>\n | 7.3.7 Active\/reactive current support of inverter-based resource during fault <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
82<\/td>\n | 7.4 Operating experiences 7.4.1 Operating experience \u2013 China Figure 50 \u2013 Circuit diagram in Jiuquan <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
83<\/td>\n | 7.4.2 Operating experience Figure 51 \u2013 Analysis of wind power disconnection incident <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
84<\/td>\n | Figure 52 \u2013 Demonstration of voltage regulation performanceduring variable power output conditions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
85<\/td>\n | 7.5 Summary 8 Oscillatory instability issue for low short circuit ratio AC networks 8.1 Problem statement Table 9 \u2013 New oscillation issues of power systems in the world <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
87<\/td>\n | Figure 53 \u2013 Configuration of a system of multiple grid-tied VSIs <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
88<\/td>\n | 8.2 Modelling and stability analysis 8.2.1 Analysis and modelling of the inverter in the time-domain 8.2.2 Analysis and modelling of the inverter in the frequency-domain <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
89<\/td>\n | Figure 54 \u2013 Control schematic diagram and structure of inverter <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
91<\/td>\n | Table 10 \u2013 Detailed influence frequency ranges of every loop <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
92<\/td>\n | Figure 55 \u2013 Frequency coupling in different frequency range <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
93<\/td>\n | Figure 56 \u2013 Negative resistor caused by PLL <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
94<\/td>\n | Figure 57 \u2013 Negative resistor caused by DVC <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
95<\/td>\n | 8.3 Mitigation of the oscillation issues by active damping control Figure 58 \u2013 Equivalent circuits of the LC-filter considering the virtual resistor Table 11 \u2013 Approximate distribution of high frequency negative damping range <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
96<\/td>\n | 8.4 Cases study based on the benchmark model Figure 59 \u2013 Active damping control methods <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
97<\/td>\n | Figure 60 \u2013 Impact of virtual resistance control on the stability <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
98<\/td>\n | Table 12 \u2013 Typical cases of weak grid parameters <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
99<\/td>\n | Figure 61 \u2013 Impact of line length on the stability <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
100<\/td>\n | Figure 62 \u2013 Impact of PLL on the stability <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
101<\/td>\n | 8.5 Summary Figure 63 \u2013 Impact of current control loop on the stability <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
102<\/td>\n | 9 Conclusions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
103<\/td>\n | Bibliography <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Dynamic characteristics of inverter-based resources in bulk power systems – Interconnecting inverter-based resources to low short circuit ratio AC networks<\/b><\/p>\n |