This part of ISO\/IEC 15067, which is a Technical Report, provides a conceptual framework for developing architectures and designing solutions related to transactive energy (TE). Transactive energy allows electricity generated locally by consumers using wind, solar, storage, etc., at homes or buildings to be sold into a competitive market. This document provides guidance for enhancing interoperability among distributed energy resources involved in energy management systems at homes and buildings. It addresses gaps identified as problematic for the industry by providing definitions of terms, architectural principles and guidelines, and other descriptive elements that present a common ground for all interested parties to discuss and advance TE.<\/p>\n
This document builds upon ISO\/IEC 15067-3 [9], with technology to accommodate a market for buying and selling electricity generated centrally or locally by consumers. The energy management agent (EMA) specified in ISO\/IEC 15067-3 can represent the customer as a participant in TE. Transactive energy is important for achieving electric grid stability as power from renewable sources such as wind and solar fluctuates with time and weather.<\/p>\n
| PDF Pages<\/th>\n | PDF Title<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2<\/td>\n | undefined <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 4<\/td>\n | CONTENTS <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 7<\/td>\n | FOREWORD <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 9<\/td>\n | INTRODUCTION <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 11<\/td>\n | Figures Figure 1 \u2013 Overview of GWAC transactive energy reference documents <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 12<\/td>\n | 1 Scope 2 Normative references 3 Terms and definitions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 16<\/td>\n | 4 Abbreviated terms <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 17<\/td>\n | 5 Context setting 5.1 Context for transactive issues <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 18<\/td>\n | 5.2 Report contents and organization 5.3 The problem Figure 2 \u2013 A framework provides high-level perspective <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 20<\/td>\n | 5.4 Time scales <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 21<\/td>\n | 5.5 Economic\/market context Figure 3 \u2013 Electric power system timelines <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 22<\/td>\n | 5.6 Grid control systems context <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 23<\/td>\n | Figure 4 \u2013 Growing complexity of electric power system control <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 24<\/td>\n | 6 Transactive energy 6.1 Transition from central power generation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 25<\/td>\n | 6.2 Transactive energy definition 6.3 Transactive energy attributes Tables Table 1 \u2013 Characteristics of transactive energy <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 26<\/td>\n | 6.4 Transactive energy principles <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 27<\/td>\n | 6.5 Evolution of the grid and its effects on transactive energy Figure 5 \u2013 Stages of adoption of DER <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 28<\/td>\n | 6.6 Strata of transactive energy Figure 6 \u2013 GWAC Stack with strata of transactive energy <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 29<\/td>\n | 7 Framework 7.1 The elements of transactive energy Table 2 \u2013 Challenges faced from interoperability and transactive perspectives <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 30<\/td>\n | 7.2 Policy and market design <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 32<\/td>\n | Figure 7 \u2013 Transactive energy stakeholders <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 34<\/td>\n | 7.3 Business models and value realization 7.3.1 Overview <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 35<\/td>\n | 7.3.2 Overview of DER services and technical capabilities Figure 8 \u2013 Services available from DERs <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 37<\/td>\n | 7.3.3 DER services and values recognized today <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 41<\/td>\n | 7.3.4 DER values not yet recognized and quantified <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 44<\/td>\n | 7.3.5 Transactive markets and peer-to-peer transactions 7.3.6 Distribution system operator 7.3.7 Distribution system operator models <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 46<\/td>\n | 7.3.8 Summary: redefining the value of the grid 7.4 Conceptual architecture guidelines 7.4.1 Creating a conceptual architecture <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 47<\/td>\n | 7.4.2 Guiding architectural principles Figure 9 \u2013 Architecture layers and iteration levels <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 48<\/td>\n | 7.4.3 Scope of the conceptual architecture for transactive energy <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 49<\/td>\n | 7.4.4 Organizing paradigms Figure 10 \u2013 The GridWise Architecture Council’s interoperability framework <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 50<\/td>\n | Figure 11 \u2013 NIST Smart Grid Conceptual Model <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 51<\/td>\n | Figure 12 \u2013 Grid Vision 2050 transactive energy abstraction model Figure 13 \u2013 Integrated Control Abstraction Stack\/GWAC Stack model <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 52<\/td>\n | 7.5 Cyber-physical infrastructure 7.5.1 Two cyber-physical networks 7.5.2 Understanding the electricity grid <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 55<\/td>\n | 7.5.3 Hierarchy of node levels <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 56<\/td>\n | 7.5.4 Node characteristics and responsibilities <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 57<\/td>\n | 7.5.5 Transaction train Table 3 \u2013 Summary of node characteristics and responsibilities <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 58<\/td>\n | Figure 14 \u2013 Transaction train model <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 60<\/td>\n | Annex A (informative) Case studies A.1 Use of case study template A.2 Case study template A.2.1 Title of the case study A.2.2 Case study characteristics and objectives A.2.3 Transactive energy attributes <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 62<\/td>\n | A.2.4 Participating agencies and organizations A.2.5 References for case study <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 63<\/td>\n | Annex B (informative) Pacific Northwest Smart Grid Demonstration B.1 Project characteristics and objectives B.2 Transactive energy attributes B.2.1 Architecture <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 64<\/td>\n | B.2.2 Extent B.2.3 Transacting parties B.2.4 Transaction B.2.5 Transacted commodities <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 65<\/td>\n | B.2.6 Temporal variability B.2.7 Interoperability B.2.8 Value discovery mechanisms B.2.9 Value assignment <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 66<\/td>\n | B.2.10 Alignment of objectives B.2.11 Stability assurance B.3 Participating agencies and organizations B.4 References for case study <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 67<\/td>\n | Annex C (informative) American Electric Power gridSMART\u00ae smart grid demonstration C.1 Project characteristics and objectives C.2 Transactive energy attributes C.2.1 Architecture C.2.2 Extent C.2.3 Transacting parties C.2.4 Transactions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 68<\/td>\n | C.2.5 Transacted commodities C.2.6 Temporal variability C.2.7 Interoperability C.2.8 Value discovery mechanisms <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 69<\/td>\n | C.2.9 Value assignment C.2.10 Alignment of objectives C.2.11 Stability assurance C.3 Participating agencies and organizations <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 70<\/td>\n | C.4 References for case study <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 71<\/td>\n | Bibliography <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Information technology. Home electronic system (HES) application model – GridWise transactive energy framework<\/b><\/p>\n |