{"id":369520,"date":"2024-10-20T02:15:17","date_gmt":"2024-10-20T02:15:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/product\/uncategorized\/fema-buildingcodessave-appendices-2020\/"},"modified":"2024-10-26T03:51:38","modified_gmt":"2024-10-26T03:51:38","slug":"fema-buildingcodessave-appendices-2020","status":"publish","type":"product","link":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/product\/publishers\/fema\/fema-buildingcodessave-appendices-2020\/","title":{"rendered":"FEMA BuildingCodesSave Appendices 2020"},"content":{"rendered":"
None<\/p>\n
PDF Pages<\/th>\n | PDF Title<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1<\/td>\n | Building Codes Save: A Nationwide Study <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
5<\/td>\n | Table of Contents <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
13<\/td>\n | APPENDIX A: CoreLogic Data Summary and AALA Results <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
15<\/td>\n | A.1 CoreLogic Data Summary <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
26<\/td>\n | A.2 AALA Results Tables <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
27<\/td>\n | APPENDIX B: Building Code Data <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
29<\/td>\n | B.1 ISO BCEGS Maps <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
35<\/td>\n | APPENDIX C: Data Processing Methodology and Quality Control <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
37<\/td>\n | C.1 Summary of Data Processing C.1.1 ArcGIS Data Processing Procedure Summary <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
38<\/td>\n | C.1.2 Amazon Web Services Data Processing Procedure Summary <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
39<\/td>\n | C.1.3 Data Processing Conclusions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
41<\/td>\n | C.1.4 Data Quality Control C.2 In-Depth ArcGIS Data Processing C.2.1 Preprocessing the CoreLogic Data C.2.2 Level 1 Filter: Empty Parcels <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
42<\/td>\n | C.2.3 Level 2 Filter: Parcels Not Built from 2000 to 2018 C.2.4 Level 3 Filter: Merge Stacked Parcels C.2.5 Level 4 Filter: Square Footage Less than 500 Square Feet C.2.6 Level 5 Filter: Merge Large Buildings <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
43<\/td>\n | C.2.7 Level 6 Filter: Parcels to Buildings C.2.8 Level 7 Filter: Counties with Less than 10 Buildings C.2.9 Final Data Calculations <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
44<\/td>\n | C.3 ArcGIS Quality Control <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
46<\/td>\n | C.4 In-depth Amazon Web Services Data Processing C.4.1 Block 1: Building Stock Methodology <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
48<\/td>\n | C.4.2 Block 2: Data Augmentation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
49<\/td>\n | C.4.3 Block 3: Python Script Processing <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
59<\/td>\n | C.5 Amazon Web Services Data Quality Control C.6 ArcGIS to Amazon Web Services Data Comparison <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
61<\/td>\n | APPENDIX D: Flood Hazard Methodology Details <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
63<\/td>\n | D.1 Supplemental Information for Flood Code Adoption D.1.1 NFIP and I-Codes <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
64<\/td>\n | D.1.1.1 Use of IRC with Freeboard Adoption Assumptions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
65<\/td>\n | D.1.1.2 Freeboard Flood Requirements in the IBC <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
68<\/td>\n | D.1.1.3 Freeboard Flood Requirements for Manufactured Housing <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
69<\/td>\n | D.1.2 State-Level Data <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
70<\/td>\n | D.1.3 Community Rating System Data D.1.3.1 Overview of CRS Data Analysis Assigning Freeboard Levels <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
71<\/td>\n | CRS Data Analysis Process <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
72<\/td>\n | Freeboard Assignments by Year <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
73<\/td>\n | CRS Freeboard Data Summary D.1.3.2 Detailed CRS Analysis Procedures <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
74<\/td>\n | Methodology to Populate Missing or \u201c0\u201d Year Assessed Values <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
78<\/td>\n | Development of Freeboard Matrix <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
80<\/td>\n | Final Detailed CRS Freeboard Data Summary <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
85<\/td>\n | D.1.4 Local Freeboard Data Sources D.1.5 Final Study Freeboard Database <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
91<\/td>\n | D.2 Supplemental Information for Flood Hazard Data D.2.1 Flood Profile Modeling: Development of PELV Curve Data <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
95<\/td>\n | D.2.2 Flood Profile Modeling: Final PELV Curve Data used for Study <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
98<\/td>\n | D.3 Supplemental Information for Flood Modeling Methodology <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
99<\/td>\n | D.3.1 Supplemental Information for Flood Modeling Methodology D.3.1.1 Supplemental Flood Data <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
100<\/td>\n | D.3.1.2 Number of Stories D.3.1.3 Foundation Type D.3.2 Supplemental Information for Flood Depth-Damage Functions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
101<\/td>\n | D.3.2.1 Residential DDF Development <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
103<\/td>\n | Initial Development of One-Story Single-Family Coastal DDFs <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
106<\/td>\n | Initial Development of Two-Story Single-Family Coastal DDFs <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
108<\/td>\n | Comparison of One- and Two-Story DDFs for Houses on Piles <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
109<\/td>\n | Development of Additional DDFs <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
110<\/td>\n | Closed Foundations High Wave and Moderate Wave Conditions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
114<\/td>\n | Basement Foundations Subject to Flooding <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
120<\/td>\n | D.3.2.2 Non-Residential DDF Development D.3.2.3 Contents DDF Development <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
121<\/td>\n | D.4 Data Quality <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
125<\/td>\n | APPENDIX E: Wind Hazard Methodology Details <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
127<\/td>\n | E.1 Supplemental Information for Wind Code History E.1.1 Hurricane Wind Hazard Study Area States with No Significant Wind Design Amendments to Model Codes <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
128<\/td>\n | E.1.2 Connecticut E.1.3 Delaware E.1.4 Hawaii E.1.5 Louisiana <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
129<\/td>\n | E.1.6 Mississippi E.1.7 North Carolina E.1.8 Rhode Island E.1.9 BCEGS States <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
130<\/td>\n | E.2 Supplemental Information for Hurricane Wind Modeling Methodology <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
134<\/td>\n | E.2.1 Building Code History Model <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
135<\/td>\n | E.2.1.1 Wind-Borne Debris Region\/Shutters E.2.1.2 Roof-to-Wall Connection <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
136<\/td>\n | E.2.1.3 Roof Deck Attachment <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
137<\/td>\n | E.2.1.4 Full Load Path for Wood Construction <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
138<\/td>\n | E.2.1.5 Window Design Pressures <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
139<\/td>\n | E.2.2 Hazus Loss Modification Functions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
140<\/td>\n | E.2.2.1 Ring-Shank Nails <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
143<\/td>\n | E.2.2.2 Full Load Path <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
146<\/td>\n | E.2.2.3 Window Design Pressures <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
151<\/td>\n | APPENDIX F: Seismic Hazard Methodology Details <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
153<\/td>\n | F.1 Supplemental Code Adoption History F.1.1 Identification of the Pre-IBC Code <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
154<\/td>\n | F.1.2 Code History in California F.1.3 Code History in Oregon F.1.4 Code History in Washington F.1.5 Code History in Utah <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
155<\/td>\n | F.1.6 Code History in Alaska <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
156<\/td>\n | F.1.7 Code History in Hawaii F.2 Supplemental Seismic Hazard Data F.2.1 Probabilistic Ground Motion Data <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
157<\/td>\n | F.2.2 Soils Data <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
158<\/td>\n | F.2.3 UBC Seismic Zone Maps and Near-Fault Data <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
162<\/td>\n | F.2.4 Analysis Prioritization <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
164<\/td>\n | F.3 Supplemental Seismic Modeling Methodology F.3.1 Hazus Design Level Determination F.3.1.1 Development of Hazus Design Levels for Exceptionally High Hazard <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
165<\/td>\n | F.3.1.2 Incorporation of Site Soils Data into Design Level <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
166<\/td>\n | F.3.1.3 Hazus Design Level Assignments for Pre-IBC Commercial Construction <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
167<\/td>\n | F.3.1.4 Hazus Design Level Assignments for Commercial Construction under the 1997 UBC <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
169<\/td>\n | F.3.1.5 Hazus Design Level Assignments for Commercial Construction under the IBC <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
172<\/td>\n | F.3.1.6 Hazus Design Level Assignments for Residential Construction under the 1994 UBC <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
175<\/td>\n | F.3.1.7 Hazus Design Level Assignments for Residential Construction under the 1997 UBC <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
176<\/td>\n | F.3.1.8 Hazus Design Level Assignments for Residential Construction for all Editions of the International Residential Code <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
178<\/td>\n | F.3.2 Hazus Model Building Type Determination and Required Data F.3.2.1 Height Proxy Approach <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
182<\/td>\n | F.3.2.2 Model Building Type <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
188<\/td>\n | F.3.2.3 Custom Modeling of Post and Pier Houses in Hawaii <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
189<\/td>\n | F.3.3 Limitations of the Seismic Methodology <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
191<\/td>\n | F.4 Supplemental Information for California Demonstration Study Results F.4.1 Development of Final Analysis Datasets for California <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
196<\/td>\n | F.4.2 California Average Annual Losses Avoided <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
197<\/td>\n | F.4.2.1 Negative Losses Avoided <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
200<\/td>\n | F.4.2.2 Losses by Analysis Priority F.4.2.3 Inclusion of all Buildings versus Only Those Producing Losses Avoided F.4.2.4 Losses by Occupancy Class <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
201<\/td>\n | F.4.3 California Inventory and Business Interruption Losses by County and Occupancy <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
206<\/td>\n | F.5 Data Development for the New Madrid Seismic Zone (NMSZ) F.5.1 NMSZ States \u2013 County Analysis Prioritization <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
208<\/td>\n | F.5.2 NMSZ States \u2013 NEHRP Soil F.5.3 NMSZ States \u2013 Code Adoption History <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
211<\/td>\n | F.5.4 Extrapolation of the Current BCS Study Results for the Western States to the NMSZ States <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
212<\/td>\n | F.5.4.1 BCS Results Used in the NMSZ Extrapolation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
213<\/td>\n | F.5.4.2 CoreLogic Data for the NMSZ States F.5.4.3 Limitations of the Current Extrapolation Approach <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
216<\/td>\n | F.5.4.4 Results of the Extrapolation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Building Codes Save: A Nationwide Study, Appendices<\/b><\/p>\n |